From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Introduce
 i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:58:47 -0700
Message-ID: <20130326135847.7d8daff4@jbarnes-desktop>
References: <1361309508-4901-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<1361309508-4901-3-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<20130326194624.GY9021@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com
	[69.89.16.30])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35054E6206
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130326194624.GY9021@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:46:24 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:31:37PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > 
> > Wrap a preallocated region of stolen memory within an ordinary GEM
> > object, for example the BIOS framebuffer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. My merge plan here still stands
> like it was a few weeks ago: I'd like to slurp in patches 2-5 asap (i.e.
> up to the framebuffer wrapping), but I think the inital mode readout
> should be rebased on top of the pipe_config infrastructure.
> 
> For patch 1 I still think that would look better when we just move the pch
> refclock init into the global modeset resources stuff - we need do to such
> things with our refclock handling anyway for some cute hsw features.
> 
> But since the other patches in the fb wrapping part seem to have pending
> review request from Imre, I'll punt on the others for now.

Ok thanks, I'll update with Imre's comments and see about the PCH
refclk bits and repost the series.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center