From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Introduce
 i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:46:24 +0100
Message-ID: <20130326194624.GY9021@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1361309508-4901-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<1361309508-4901-3-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com (mail-ea0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.215.169])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94DFE5D12
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n15so1480161ead.28
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1361309508-4901-3-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:31:37PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> Wrap a preallocated region of stolen memory within an ordinary GEM
> object, for example the BIOS framebuffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. My merge plan here still stands
like it was a few weeks ago: I'd like to slurp in patches 2-5 asap (i.e.
up to the framebuffer wrapping), but I think the inital mode readout
should be rebased on top of the pipe_config infrastructure.

For patch 1 I still think that would look better when we just move the pch
refclock init into the global modeset resources stuff - we need do to such
things with our refclock handling anyway for some cute hsw features.

But since the other patches in the fb wrapping part seem to have pending
review request from Imre, I'll punt on the others for now.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch