From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] drm/i915: Make struct dpll ==
	intel_clock_t
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:50:26 +0200
Message-ID: <20130420145026.GY6169@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <20130419101446.GX4469@intel.com>
	<1366371411-20717-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.212.169])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CB5E60BE
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h11so2453872wiv.2
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1366371411-20717-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:36:51PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wro=
te:
> From: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> =

> This allows unifying a bunch of the PLL calculations and whatnot.
> =

> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Yeah, makes sense. Originally my idea was to have a clear cut between
old&new pll computation code, but in hindsight less churn looks like the
better idea.

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- =

Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch