From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: No contexts without ppgtt Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:06:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20130424100612.GF11689@cantiga.alporthouse.com> References: <1366784140-2670-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <1366784140-2670-13-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946D4E632D for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1366784140-2670-13-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: Intel GFX List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:15:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Going forward, every context will have its own address space. So rip off > the band aid now. If contexts fail, don't do ppgtt, and vice versa. > > Similarly to the last patch, this is somewhat wasteful of PPGTT address > space with contexts, since we're not actually utilizing the new PPGTT. What strategy do we have for isolating bugs between ctx and ppggt? I'd like to be able disable each of them independently and together. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre