From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename ring flush functions Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 18:28:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20130507172801.GL26612@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1367110769-1306-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <1367110769-1306-6-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5713E5C4E for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1367110769-1306-6-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: Intel-GFX List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Historically we considered the render ring to have special flush > semantics and everything else to fall under a more general umbrella. > Probably by coincidence more than anything we decided to make the bsd > ring have the default *other* flush. As the new vebox ring exposes, the > bsd ring is actually the weird one. Doing this allows us to call > gen6_ring_flush for the vebox because calling blt_ring_flush would be > weird... > > This patch should have no functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau -- Damien