From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: don't enable PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:18:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20130612171838.GF22870@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1371037046-3732-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1371037046-3732-20-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20130612171340.GA15749@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04A9E6450 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id t10so4345163eei.41 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130612171340.GA15749@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:13:41AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:37:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > The code to handle it is broken - there's simply no code to clear CS > > parser errors on gen5+. And behold, for all the other rings we also > > don't enable it! > > > > Leave the handling code itself in place just to be consistent with the > > existing mess though. And in case someone feels like fixing it all up. > > > > This has been errornously enabled in > > > > commit 12638c57f31952127c734c26315e1348fa1334c2 > > Author: Ben Widawsky > > Date: Tue May 28 19:22:31 2013 -0700 > > > > drm/i915: Enable vebox interrupts > > > > Cc: Damien Lespiau > > Cc: Ben Widawsky > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > > Why not fix the problem instead of just disabling the interrupt? Then > the "existing mess" is justified. It really shouldn't be terribly > difficult to fix it. Haven't seen it proven useful, and I don't want to blow through time just for fun on it. Hangcheck seems to be able to deal with it just fine. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch