From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: fold the no-irq check into
 intel_hpd_irq_handler
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:39:52 +0200
Message-ID: <20130627103952.GN18285@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1371037046-3732-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1371037046-3732-8-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<20920.34515.539602.276112@linux-qknr.site>
	<CA+gsUGTto43rENnfAg_XPF4nNYy=qo5xVHQrawzts6k2Py5xGg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2347E5EB1
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l10so296571eei.16
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGTto43rENnfAg_XPF4nNYy=qo5xVHQrawzts6k2Py5xGg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>, Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 07:35:18PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/6/12 Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com>:
> > Daniel Vetter writes:
> >  > The usual pattern for our sub-function irq_handlers is that they check
> >  > for the no-irq case themselves. This results in more streamlined code
> >  > in the upper irq handlers.
> >  >
> >  > Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
> >  > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >  > ---
> >  >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >  >
> >
> > [reviewed code deleted]
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
> 
> Patches 4, 5, 6 and 7 (all reviewed by Egbert) are also Reviewed-by:
> Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> But I do have to notice they don't apply anymore due to
> s/hpd_status_i965/hpd_status_i915/

Yeah, I'll fix up the patches and resend the first 7 anew.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch