From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 11:40:57 -0700
Message-ID: <20130704184057.GK5488@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1372960927-1112-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<1372960927-1112-5-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<20130704181441.GG18285@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from shiva.localdomain (unknown [209.20.75.48])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9D3E5F5E
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu,  4 Jul 2013 11:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130704181441.GG18285@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:02:07AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > To make users life a little easier figuring out what they have on their
> > system.
> > 
> > Ideally, I'd really like to report LLC size, but it turned out to be a
> > bit of a pain. Maybe I'll revisit it in the future.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> 
> I think a getparam for eLLC would be neat, so that usespace can use it to
> tune working set sizes.
> -Daniel
>
And I assume drop debugfs?
-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center