From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip pixel multiplier x-check if we fail to send the command Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:35:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20130711203517.GF20291@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1373568360-12566-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <20130711195233.GX6143@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89054E5CFB for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130711195233.GX6143@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:52:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:46:00PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > If intel_sdvo_get_value() fails here, val is unitialized and the cross > > check won't check anything. > > > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > index b8e1623..4481f6a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > @@ -1357,7 +1357,10 @@ static void intel_sdvo_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > > } > > > > /* Cross check the port pixel multiplier with the sdvo encoder state. */ > > - intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT, &val, 1); > > + if (!intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT, > > + &val, 1)) > > + return; > > But now it fails silently instead of being paranoid ... Can we just shut > up the tool instead? We absolutely can! (and it's done). -- Damien