From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: add early quirk for reserving
 Intel graphics stolen memory v3
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:12:21 -0700
Message-ID: <20130726101221.016e93b5@jbarnes-desktop>
References: <1374770269-3223-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<1374770269-3223-3-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<51F2AAC5.6020808@zytor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy5.bluehost.com (oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.38.55])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA9CBE6051
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51F2AAC5.6020808@zytor.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:58:45 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> On 07/25/2013 09:37 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Systems with Intel graphics controllers set aside memory exclusively for
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Almost universally we can find the Graphics Base of Stolen Memory
> > +	 * at offset 0x5c in the igfx configuration space. On a few (desktop)
> > +	 * machines this is also mirrored in the bridge device at different
> > +	 * locations, or in the MCHBAR.
> > +	 */
> 
> This comment makes me nervous.  It isn't clear to me if it is saying:
> 
> - All igfx devices has the graphics base at 0x5c, a few have it in
>   other places, too (which doesn't matter, we can use 0x5c anyway), or
> - Most igfx devices have the graphics base at 0x5c, some don't, and we
>   hope and pray we're not on one of those systems because we're not
>   checking.
> 
> I assume it is the former, but it really needs to be phrased better.

I mostly copied it from the driver where we had some other ways of
finding it too.  For the PCI IDs listed, we can always use 0x5c.  I'll
fix the comment.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center