From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: List objects allocated from
 stolen memory in debugfs
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:54:37 +0200
Message-ID: <20130808095437.GK22035@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1375896654-2318-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<20130807214420.GE22035@phenom.ffwll.local>
	<20130808091531.GA26474@cantiga.alporthouse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f173.google.com (mail-ea0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.215.173])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0781E6171
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu,  8 Aug 2013 02:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id g10so1330554eak.18
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130808091531.GA26474@cantiga.alporthouse.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:15:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:44:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:30:54PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > I was curious as to what objects were currently allocated from stolen
> > > memory, and so exported it from debugfs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > 
> > I liike this, but since I've just merged Ben's exec_list vma conversion it
> > doesn't apply any more cleanly. Can you please rebase and resend?
> 
> It applies cleanly to current -nightly. Or at least the local
> approximation thereof.

I've gotten ahead of myself here, it applies cleanly. But it'll fail once
patch 25 is in from Ben. Otoh that one has review outstanding, so I think
it's the one to give in. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch