From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Restore the preliminary HW check.
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:58 -0700
Message-ID: <20130823163358.00b0502e@jbarnes-desktop>
References: <1377298807-24994-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com
	(oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.24.6])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C8B2E5FF0
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1377298807-24994-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:00:07 -0700
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:

> We still maintain code internally that cares about preliminary support.
> Leaving the check here doesn't hurt anyone, and should keep things more
> in line.
> 
> This time around, stick the info in the intel_info structure, and also
> change the error from DRM_ERROR->DRM_INFO.

I hate this param.

But this looks like a better way to do it than the ID list we had in
pci_probe before.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center