From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915: Always prefer CPU
 relocations with LLC
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:25:49 +0200
Message-ID: <20130827152549.GL26909@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1377557469-4078-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
	<1377557469-4078-9-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
	<20130827144924.GZ11428@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f171.google.com (mail-ea0-f171.google.com
	[209.85.215.171])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B89E622B
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n15so2367433ead.30
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130827144924.GZ11428@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:49:24PM +0300, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:51:00PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > =

> > A follow-on to the update of the LLC coherency logic is that we can rely
> > on the LLC being coherent with the CS for rewriting batchbuffers
> > irrespective of their cache domain. (This should have no effect
> > currently as all the batch buffers are expected to be I915_CACHE_LLC and
> > so using the cpu relocation path anyway.)
> > =

> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> =

> Makes sense.
> =

> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- =

Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch