From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Rip out SUPPORTS_EDP
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:00:38 +0200
Message-ID: <20130924090018.GA13668@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1379767002-16299-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<CA+gsUGRY6x7c4yezzFwqjLm6r0=O=t1d6K=VQzooxriGn+tZMw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE807E5EBC
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so2315903eek.17
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGRY6x7c4yezzFwqjLm6r0=O=t1d6K=VQzooxriGn+tZMw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>, Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:04:43PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/9/21 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>:
> > It only controls the setting of the vbt.edp_support variable, which in
> > turn only controls one debug output plus can also force-disable the
> > lvds output.
> >
> > Since the value only restricted this logic to mobile ilk there's the
> > slight risk that this will break lvds on desktop ilk or on snb/ivb
> > platforms. But with the vbt it's better when we know what's going on
> > here, so let's rip it out and see what happens.
> 
> I think this is a little bit too risky, but the patch does what it
> says in the box and also mentions the risk... I was going to give a
> Reviewed-by tag and leave the merge-or-not-merge question to the
> maintainer, but I noticed the patch is already even merged (by
> accident?).

I was lazy and didn't create a seperate branch for it ;-) Can I still
smash your r-b on top?

> Are we aware of any real-world machines with eDP + LVDS?

I haven't seen any of those. What has been observed in the wild is lvds +
sdvo lvds, but I've never seen edp + some other panel anywhere ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch