From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Skip register reads in i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos()
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:11:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924091127.GE13668@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379936930-26044-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:48:50PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> We have all the information we need in the mode structure, so going and
> reading it from the hardware is pointless, and slower.
>
> We never populated ->get_vblank_timestamp() in the UMS case, and as that
> is the only way we'd ever call ->get_scanout_position(), we can
> completely ignore UMS in i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos().
>
> Also reorganize intel_irq_init() a bit to clarify the KMS vs. UMS
> situation.
>
> v2: Drop UMS code
>
> Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index b356dc1..058f099 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -570,24 +570,29 @@ static u32 gm45_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> int *vpos, int *hpos)
> {
> - drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = (drm_i915_private_t *) dev->dev_private;
> - u32 vbl = 0, position = 0;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &intel_crtc->config.adjusted_mode;
> + u32 position;
> int vbl_start, vbl_end, htotal, vtotal;
> bool in_vbl = true;
> int ret = 0;
> - enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder(dev_priv,
> - pipe);
Hooray, this rips out the racy pipe_to_cpu_transcoder deref, so I'm all in
favour \o/ Of course I still have that ugly itme on my todo about "fix the
locking for kms vblank stuff" ;-)
Mario, can you please take a look at these patches and ack them? I'd like
to slurp them in for -next.
-Daniel
>
> - if (!i915_pipe_enabled(dev, pipe)) {
> + if (!intel_crtc->active) {
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("trying to get scanoutpos for disabled "
> "pipe %c\n", pipe_name(pipe));
> return 0;
> }
>
> - /* Get vtotal. */
> - vtotal = 1 + ((I915_READ(VTOTAL(cpu_transcoder)) >> 16) & 0x1fff);
> + htotal = mode->crtc_htotal;
> + vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal;
> + vbl_start = mode->crtc_vblank_start;
> + vbl_end = mode->crtc_vblank_end;
>
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
> + ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID | DRM_SCANOUTPOS_ACCURATE;
> +
> + if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> /* No obvious pixelcount register. Only query vertical
> * scanout position from Display scan line register.
> */
> @@ -605,29 +610,16 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> */
> position = (I915_READ(PIPEFRAMEPIXEL(pipe)) & PIPE_PIXEL_MASK) >> PIPE_PIXEL_SHIFT;
>
> - htotal = 1 + ((I915_READ(HTOTAL(cpu_transcoder)) >> 16) & 0x1fff);
> *vpos = position / htotal;
> *hpos = position - (*vpos * htotal);
> }
>
> - /* Query vblank area. */
> - vbl = I915_READ(VBLANK(cpu_transcoder));
> -
> - /* Test position against vblank region. */
> - vbl_start = vbl & 0x1fff;
> - vbl_end = (vbl >> 16) & 0x1fff;
> -
> - if ((*vpos < vbl_start) || (*vpos > vbl_end))
> - in_vbl = false;
> + in_vbl = *vpos >= vbl_start && *vpos < vbl_end;
>
> /* Inside "upper part" of vblank area? Apply corrective offset: */
> if (in_vbl && (*vpos >= vbl_start))
> *vpos = *vpos - vtotal;
>
> - /* Readouts valid? */
> - if (vbl > 0)
> - ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID | DRM_SCANOUTPOS_ACCURATE;
> -
> /* In vblank? */
> if (in_vbl)
> ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_INVBL;
> @@ -3148,11 +3140,10 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> dev->driver->get_vblank_counter = gm45_get_vblank_counter;
> }
>
> - if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> + if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
> dev->driver->get_vblank_timestamp = i915_get_vblank_timestamp;
> - else
> - dev->driver->get_vblank_timestamp = NULL;
> - dev->driver->get_scanout_position = i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos;
> + dev->driver->get_scanout_position = i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos;
> + }
>
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> dev->driver->irq_handler = valleyview_irq_handler;
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-23 10:02 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos improvements ville.syrjala
2013-09-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Skip register reads in i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos() ville.syrjala
2013-09-23 10:30 ` Chris Wilson
2013-09-23 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 " ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 9:11 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-09-25 4:45 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-09-25 7:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-25 2:35 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-09-25 8:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-09-26 16:12 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-09-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Fix scanoutpos calculations ville.syrjala
2013-09-25 2:39 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-10-11 14:31 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-10-11 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 " ville.syrjala
2013-10-11 23:19 ` [PATCH " Daniel Vetter
2013-10-11 23:22 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-10-14 15:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Improve the accuracy of get_scanout_pos on CTG+ ville.syrjala
2013-09-25 3:12 ` Mario Kleiner
2013-09-25 8:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-09-25 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-26 17:04 ` Mario Kleiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130924091127.GE13668@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox