From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix type mismatch and accounting in i915_gem_shrink
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:29:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924102959.GK13668@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380016338-26974-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:52:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The interface uses an unsigned long, and we can use the unsigned counter
> throughout our code, so do so. In the process, we notice one instance
> where the shrink count is based on a heuristic rather than the result,
> and another where we ask for too many pages to be purged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 1bfb792..af6ff15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static unsigned long i915_gem_inactive_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> struct shrink_control *sc);
> static unsigned long i915_gem_inactive_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> struct shrink_control *sc);
> -static long i915_gem_purge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, long target);
> -static long i915_gem_shrink_all(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +static unsigned long i915_gem_purge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, long target);
> +static unsigned long i915_gem_shrink_all(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> static void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
>
> static bool cpu_cache_is_coherent(struct drm_device *dev,
> @@ -1825,13 +1825,13 @@ i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static long
> +static unsigned long
> __i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, long target,
> bool purgeable_only)
> {
> struct list_head still_bound_list;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
> - long count = 0;
> + unsigned long count = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next,
> &dev_priv->mm.unbound_list,
> @@ -1897,13 +1897,13 @@ __i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, long target,
> return count;
> }
>
> -static long
> +static unsigned long
> i915_gem_purge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, long target)
> {
> return __i915_gem_shrink(dev_priv, target, true);
> }
>
> -static long
> +static unsigned long
> i915_gem_shrink_all(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
> @@ -1913,9 +1913,8 @@ i915_gem_shrink_all(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next, &dev_priv->mm.unbound_list,
> global_list) {
> - if (obj->pages_pin_count == 0)
> + if (i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj) == 0)
> freed += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj);
> }
> return freed;
> }
> @@ -5091,6 +5090,7 @@ i915_gem_inactive_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
>
> if (unlock)
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> return count;
> }
>
> @@ -5178,12 +5178,14 @@ i915_gem_inactive_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
nr_to_scan here still seems to be an int. Otherwise looks good.
-Daniel
>
> freed = i915_gem_purge(dev_priv, nr_to_scan);
> if (freed < nr_to_scan)
> - freed += __i915_gem_shrink(dev_priv, nr_to_scan,
> - false);
> + freed += __i915_gem_shrink(dev_priv,
> + nr_to_scan - freed,
> + false);
> if (freed < nr_to_scan)
> freed += i915_gem_shrink_all(dev_priv);
>
> if (unlock)
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> return freed;
> }
> --
> 1.8.4.rc3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 9:52 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix type mismatch and accounting in i915_gem_shrink Chris Wilson
2013-09-24 10:29 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-10-04 9:33 ` Chris Wilson
2013-10-04 12:38 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130924102959.GK13668@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox