From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Rewrite vlv_find_best_dpll()
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:04:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130927130430.GF14385@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874n96cwcr.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 02:55:32PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com writes:
>
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Rewrite vlv_find_best_dpll() to use intel_clock_t rather than
> > an army of local variables.
> >
> > Also extract the code to calculate the derived values into
> > vlv_clock().
> >
> > v2: Split up the earlier fixes, extract vlv_clock()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index f646fea..c5f0794 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -438,6 +438,14 @@ static void i9xx_clock(int refclk, intel_clock_t *clock)
> > clock->dot = clock->vco / clock->p;
> > }
> >
> > +static void vlv_clock(int refclk, intel_clock_t *clock)
> > +{
> > + clock->m = clock->m1 * clock->m2;
> > + clock->p = clock->p1 * clock->p2;
> > + clock->vco = refclk * clock->m / clock->n;
> > + clock->dot = clock->vco / clock->p;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * Returns whether any output on the specified pipe is of the specified type
> > */
> > @@ -670,66 +678,48 @@ vlv_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
> > intel_clock_t *best_clock)
> > {
> > - u32 p1, p2, m1, m2, vco, bestn, bestm1, bestm2, bestp1, bestp2;
> > - u32 m, n, fastclk;
> > - u32 updrate, minupdate, p;
> > + intel_clock_t clock;
> > + u32 minupdate = 19200;
> > unsigned int bestppm = 1000000;
> > - int dotclk, flag;
> >
> > - flag = 0;
> > - dotclk = target * 1000;
> > - fastclk = dotclk / (2*100);
> > - updrate = 0;
> > - minupdate = 19200;
> > - n = p = p1 = p2 = m = m1 = m2 = vco = bestn = 0;
> > - bestm1 = bestm2 = bestp1 = bestp2 = 0;
> > + target *= 5; /* fast clock */
> >
> > /* based on hardware requirement, prefer smaller n to precision */
> > - for (n = limit->n.min; n <= ((refclk) / minupdate); n++) {
> > - updrate = refclk / n;
> > - for (p1 = limit->p1.max; p1 > limit->p1.min; p1--) {
> > - for (p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast+1; p2 > 0; p2--) {
> > - if (p2 > 10)
> > - p2 = p2 - 1;
> > - p = p1 * p2;
> > + for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= ((refclk) / minupdate); clock.n++) {
> > + for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.max; clock.p1 > limit->p1.min; clock.p1--) {
> > + for (clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast+1; clock.p2 > 0; clock.p2--) {
> > + if (clock.p2 > 10)
> > + clock.p2--;
> > + clock.p = clock.p1 * clock.p2;
> > /* based on hardware requirement, prefer bigger m1,m2 values */
> > - for (m1 = limit->m1.min; m1 <= limit->m1.max; m1++) {
> > + for (clock.m1 = limit->m1.min; clock.m1 <= limit->m1.max; clock.m1++) {
> > unsigned int ppm, diff;
> >
> > - m2 = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(fastclk * p * n, refclk * m1);
> > - m = m1 * m2;
> > - vco = updrate * m;
> > + clock.m2 = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(target * clock.p * clock.n,
> > + refclk * clock.m1);
> >
> > - if (vco < limit->vco.min || vco >= limit->vco.max)
> > + vlv_clock(refclk, &clock);
> > +
> > + if (clock.vco < limit->vco.min ||
> > + clock.vco >= limit->vco.max)
> > continue;
> >
> > - diff = abs(vco / p - fastclk);
> > - ppm = div_u64(1000000ULL * diff, fastclk);
> > - if (ppm < 100 && ((p1 * p2) > (bestp1 * bestp2))) {
> > + diff = abs(clock.dot - target);
> > + ppm = div_u64(1000000ULL * diff, target);
> > +
> > + if (ppm < 100 && clock.p > best_clock->p) {
>
> best_clock needs to be initialized or you end up comparing against
> bytes from stack on first hitting here.
Right. v3 coming up.
>
> > bestppm = 0;
> > - flag = 1;
> > + *best_clock = clock;
> > }
> > +
> > if (bestppm >= 10 && ppm < bestppm - 10) {
> > bestppm = ppm;
> > - flag = 1;
> > - }
> > - if (flag) {
> > - bestn = n;
> > - bestm1 = m1;
> > - bestm2 = m2;
> > - bestp1 = p1;
> > - bestp2 = p2;
> > - flag = 0;
> > + *best_clock = clock;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > - best_clock->n = bestn;
> > - best_clock->m1 = bestm1;
> > - best_clock->m2 = bestm2;
> > - best_clock->p1 = bestp1;
> > - best_clock->p2 = bestp2;
> >
> > return true;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 18:26 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: VLV DPLL calc fixes and cleanups ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Eliminate one indent leel from vlv_find_best_dpll ville.syrjala
2013-09-26 10:04 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() ville.syrjala
2013-09-26 10:09 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-09-27 19:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Make vlv_find_best_dpll() ppm calculation safe ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Don't underflow bestppm ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Rewrite vlv_find_best_dpll() ville.syrjala
2013-09-26 15:30 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-09-27 13:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-09-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 15/14] drm/i915: Use intel_PLL_is_valid() in vlv_find_best_dpll() ville.syrjala
2013-09-27 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Rewrite vlv_find_best_dpll() Mika Kuoppala
2013-09-27 13:04 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2013-09-27 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 " ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: De-magic the VLV p2 divider step size ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Make sure we respect n.max on VLV ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Clarify VLV PLL p1 limits ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Allow p1 divider 2 on VLV ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Respect p2 divider minimum limit " ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Remove the unused p and m limits for VLV ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Remove unused dot_limit from VLV PLL limits ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: intel_limits_vlv_dac and intel_limits_vlv_hdmi are the same ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Don't lie about findind suitable PLL settings on VLV ville.syrjala
2013-09-24 19:15 ` [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: VLV DPLL calc fixes and cleanups Daniel Vetter
2013-09-25 7:38 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix 1.62 DP DPLL settings for VLV ville.syrjala
2013-09-30 15:06 ` [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: VLV DPLL calc fixes and cleanups Mika Kuoppala
2013-10-04 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130927130430.GF14385@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox