From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context on 3.10.10-rt7 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:18:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20131011101800.GE6983@linutronix.de> References: <5230895B.5070400@hurleysoftware.com> <20130911113845.6d56a556@gandalf.local.home> <5230C52E.3050801@hurleysoftware.com> <5238B288.3000704@hurleysoftware.com> <523CC728.4040302@tuebingen.mpg.de> <20130923083841.GT4531@intel.com> <5242674A.8020100@tuebingen.mpg.de> <20130925101301.6cbe5d0f@gandalf.local.home> <52445DEF.1060007@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52445DEF.1060007@gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mario Kleiner Cc: Steven Rostedt , Mario Kleiner , Peter Hurley , Clark Williams , Daniel Vetter , LKML , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Dave Airlie , Thomas Gleixner , "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , intel-gfx , linux-rt-users , Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org * Mario Kleiner | 2013-09-26 18:16:47 [+0200]: >Good! I will do that. Thanks for clarifying the irq and constraints >on raw locks in the other thread. Are there any suggestions for "now"? preempt_disable_nort() like Luis suggesed? >-mario Sebastian