From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20131027192911.GK18189@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <526D3BB6.6020902@flitspace.org.uk> <20131027173302.GA25812@kroah.com> <526D5D0E.5090604@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <526D5D0E.5090604@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg KH , Rob Pearce , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote: > >>From: Rob Pearce > >> > >>The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as > >>having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to > >>the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4 > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce > >>--- > >>Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. > >>According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't. > > > >Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well? > > > > Hi Greg, > > pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ? > Did I get this wrong ? Maintainer occasionally fumble it, so it's better when the patch submitter also thinks about this. I can always change it when I disagree ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch