Re: [PATCH 00/62] Broadwell kernel driver support

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:06:58PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> It is my honor and privilege to submit basic Broadwell support on behalf
> of Intel.
> 
> The patch series includes support for Broadwell which should bring it up
> to feature parity with Haswell. As you'll note, the patches have
> received some revisions and review already. This is due to our new
> process (more on this below). We will be rolling out the new Broadwell
> goodness over time.
> 
> Broadwell represents the next generation (GEN8) in Intel graphics
> processing hardware. Broadwell graphics bring some of the biggest
> changes we've seen on the execution and memory management side of the
> GPU. (There are equally large and exciting changes for the userspace
> drivers.)
> 
> My request to reviewers is: I haven't touched these much at all since
> submitting to the internal mailing list. Most changes are due to rebase.
> Try to keep bikesheds to a minimum. We want to try to get this code in
> the 3.13 kernel, so we have a nice base to actually stabilize and
> improve features for the 3.14 release. Remember, we have that handy
> 'preliminary hardware support' to allow people to opt-in to this early
> enabling code. So I'm shooting for stable "end-userable" BDW code in
> 3.14.
> 
> Note that the last few workarounds likely won't be needed, but I think
> we can include them until we know for sure otherwise.
> 
> Aside from the usual set of things we need to update when simply
> enabling a new platform, What follows are some of the major changes from
> HSW->BDW:
> 
> * There is no longer a forcewake write FIFO. *Most* writes must explicitly
> wake the GPU.
> 
> * Interrupt registers have been completely reorganized.
> 
> * PTEs format and cachability settings have changed to more resemble x86
> PTEs, and PAT
>   * Address space increases, and as such many commands require changing
> 
> * Page table structures have changed for the Per Process GTT. The new
> structure more resembles traditional page tables with registers defining
> page directory base.
> 
> The latter two changes were the real challenge in enabling the platform
> and getting things to actually work - though in hindsight, they seem so
> trivial :-)
> 
> You may find these patches here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel/log/?h=broadwell
> 
> I'll be posting patches for libdrm, and intel-gpu-tools in the next day
> or two.  They are also ready to go, I just need to do a quick once over.
> At this point, feel free to stop reading.

Also note that we've spent a decent amount of time refactoring the
relevant areas in upstream, so now the massive changes for bdw mostly just
plug in ...

Anyway, review plan. Like Ben said this is still hidden behind the
preliminary hw support knob. Also I want to get this all merged, final
testing done and pull request sent by the end of the week. That way we can
easily get it into 3.13 and that should also reduce the mess I currently
have with the -internal branch. So
- Please check register defines really through-roughly.
- Check for erregious logic fumbles (e.g. in cleanup paths).
- For everything else which can't be fixed quickly please just propose a
  FIXME comment.

I've just grabbed a bunch of names from our team and then tried to not
come up with a too bad split for reviewing:
Mika: Patches 1-6
Chris: Patches 7-12
Paulo: Patches 13-17
Imre: Patches 18-23
Damien: Patches 24-29
Rodrigo: Patches 30-35
Ville: Patches 36-42
Ben: Patches 43-47
Jani: Patches 48-53
Jesse: Patches 54-58
Daniel: Patche 59-62

If the patches already has an r-b and hasn't been rebased like crazy since
then you're lucky ;-)

Please do the all the review on Mon/Tue so that I can spend Wed
merging (and if needed, fixing up patches) and then we'll have 2 days or
so for a bit of final integration testing.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch