From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Make intel_dp_is_edp()
 less specific
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:30:50 +0100
Message-ID: <20131104163050.GL4167@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <20131101102509.6ba6861d@jbarnes-desktop>
	<1383330728-16093-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
	<1383330728-16093-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
	<CA+gsUGTo0D4+ebK=uyxbrsNOPiz6V-Uj=4oSswHJQL9aVQDsTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58D1FA91F
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon,  4 Nov 2013 08:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b57so839736eek.19
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGTo0D4+ebK=uyxbrsNOPiz6V-Uj=4oSswHJQL9aVQDsTQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:08:19PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/11/1  <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>:
> > From: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > All the bits in the VBT child device type have some speciifc meaning,
> > so looking for an exact match isn't always the right thing. On some
> > VLVs for example the device type for eDP panels is 0x1806.
> >
> > If we mask out the bits that could concievably change between different
> > eDP panels, we are left with the set of bits that should still
> > tell us if the port is eDP or not.
> >
> > v2: Use the named bits for VBT child device type
> =

> We go with this patch until they start creating analog eDP panels or
> whatever else their creative minds come up with :)
> =

> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Both merged, thanks for patches&review.
-Daniel
-- =

Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch