* [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff
@ 2013-10-11 18:52 ville.syrjala
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout ville.syrjala
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2013-10-11 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Continuing a bit with improving the vblank timestamp stuff, I decided that
it's also time to fix gen2 properly.
All this time we've been pretending it has the same pixel+frame counter that
gen3 and gen4 have, when in fact it doesn't. Luckily the same offset has
nothing else on gen2, so it has just read out as 0 and everything more or
less worked.
Sadly there doesn't seem to be any frame counter register on gen2. For the
scanout position, DSL + additional tricks works equally well for gen2 as
it does for ctg+.
This series should be applied on top of my earlier vblank/scanout position
improvements.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout
2013-10-11 18:52 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff ville.syrjala
@ 2013-10-11 18:52 ` ville.syrjala
2013-11-06 12:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't pretend that gen2 has a hardware frame counter ville.syrjala
2013-10-14 10:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff Chris Wilson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2013-10-11 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Gen2 doesn't have the pixelcount register that gen3 and gen4 have.
Instead we must use the scanline counter like we do for ctg+.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 63a9642..3c31a2f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static u32 gm45_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
return I915_READ(reg);
}
-static bool g4x_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
+static bool intel_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
uint32_t status;
@@ -603,7 +603,13 @@ static bool g4x_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
return I915_READ(VLV_ISR) & status;
- } else if (IS_G4X(dev)) {
+ } else if (IS_GEN2(dev)) {
+ status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
+ I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
+ I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
+
+ return I915_READ16(ISR) & status;
+ } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5) {
status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
@@ -658,11 +664,14 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID | DRM_SCANOUTPOS_ACCURATE;
- if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
+ if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
/* No obvious pixelcount register. Only query vertical
* scanout position from Display scan line register.
*/
- position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & 0x1fff;
+ if (IS_GEN2(dev))
+ position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN2;
+ else
+ position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
/*
* The scanline counter increments at the leading edge
@@ -671,7 +680,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
* to get a more accurate picture whether we're in vblank
* or not.
*/
- in_vbl = g4x_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
+ in_vbl = intel_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
if ((in_vbl && position == vbl_start - 1) ||
(!in_vbl && position == vbl_end - 1))
position = (position + 1) % vtotal;
@@ -701,7 +710,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
else
position += vtotal - vbl_end;
- if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
+ if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
*vpos = position;
*hpos = 0;
} else {
--
1.8.1.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't pretend that gen2 has a hardware frame counter
2013-10-11 18:52 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff ville.syrjala
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout ville.syrjala
@ 2013-10-11 18:52 ` ville.syrjala
2013-10-14 10:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff Chris Wilson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2013-10-11 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Gen2 doesn't have a hardware frame counter that can be read out. Just
provide a stub .get_vblank_counter() that always returns 0 instead of
trying to read non-existing registers.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 3c31a2f..73781a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -518,6 +518,12 @@ i915_pipe_enabled(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
}
}
+static u32 i8xx_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
+{
+ /* Gen2 doesn't have a hardware frame counter */
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Called from drm generic code, passed a 'crtc', which
* we use as a pipe index
*/
@@ -3231,7 +3237,10 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_device *dev)
pm_qos_add_request(&dev_priv->pm_qos, PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
- if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
+ if (IS_GEN2(dev)) {
+ dev->max_vblank_count = 0;
+ dev->driver->get_vblank_counter = i8xx_get_vblank_counter;
+ } else if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
dev->max_vblank_count = 0xffffffff; /* full 32 bit counter */
dev->driver->get_vblank_counter = gm45_get_vblank_counter;
} else {
--
1.8.1.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff
2013-10-11 18:52 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff ville.syrjala
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout ville.syrjala
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't pretend that gen2 has a hardware frame counter ville.syrjala
@ 2013-10-14 10:01 ` Chris Wilson
2013-10-14 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2013-10-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:52:42PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> Continuing a bit with improving the vblank timestamp stuff, I decided that
> it's also time to fix gen2 properly.
>
> All this time we've been pretending it has the same pixel+frame counter that
> gen3 and gen4 have, when in fact it doesn't. Luckily the same offset has
> nothing else on gen2, so it has just read out as 0 and everything more or
> less worked.
>
> Sadly there doesn't seem to be any frame counter register on gen2. For the
> scanout position, DSL + additional tricks works equally well for gen2 as
> it does for ctg+.
Confirmed the absence of said registers, so
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff
2013-10-14 10:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff Chris Wilson
@ 2013-10-14 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-10-14 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, ville.syrjala, intel-gfx
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:01:11AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:52:42PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > Continuing a bit with improving the vblank timestamp stuff, I decided that
> > it's also time to fix gen2 properly.
> >
> > All this time we've been pretending it has the same pixel+frame counter that
> > gen3 and gen4 have, when in fact it doesn't. Luckily the same offset has
> > nothing else on gen2, so it has just read out as 0 and everything more or
> > less worked.
> >
> > Sadly there doesn't seem to be any frame counter register on gen2. For the
> > scanout position, DSL + additional tricks works equally well for gen2 as
> > it does for ctg+.
>
> Confirmed the absence of said registers, so
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Both merged, thanks for patches&review.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout ville.syrjala
@ 2013-11-06 12:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-11-06 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2013-11-06 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx
I was going to get this for -collector but got a big conflict.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:52 PM, <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Gen2 doesn't have the pixelcount register that gen3 and gen4 have.
> Instead we must use the scanline counter like we do for ctg+.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 63a9642..3c31a2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static u32 gm45_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> return I915_READ(reg);
> }
>
> -static bool g4x_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> +static bool intel_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> uint32_t status;
> @@ -603,7 +603,13 @@ static bool g4x_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
>
> return I915_READ(VLV_ISR) & status;
> - } else if (IS_G4X(dev)) {
> + } else if (IS_GEN2(dev)) {
> + status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
> + I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
> + I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
> +
> + return I915_READ16(ISR) & status;
> + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5) {
> status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
> I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
> I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
> @@ -658,11 +664,14 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
>
> ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID | DRM_SCANOUTPOS_ACCURATE;
>
> - if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> + if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> /* No obvious pixelcount register. Only query vertical
> * scanout position from Display scan line register.
> */
> - position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & 0x1fff;
> + if (IS_GEN2(dev))
> + position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN2;
> + else
> + position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
>
> /*
> * The scanline counter increments at the leading edge
> @@ -671,7 +680,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> * to get a more accurate picture whether we're in vblank
> * or not.
> */
> - in_vbl = g4x_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
> + in_vbl = intel_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
> if ((in_vbl && position == vbl_start - 1) ||
> (!in_vbl && position == vbl_end - 1))
> position = (position + 1) % vtotal;
> @@ -701,7 +710,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> else
> position += vtotal - vbl_end;
>
> - if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> + if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> *vpos = position;
> *hpos = 0;
> } else {
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout
2013-11-06 12:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
@ 2013-11-06 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2013-11-06 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rodrigo Vivi; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:38:42AM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I was going to get this for -collector but got a big conflict.
It should be already in. Although as it turns out it's partially
crap. Apparently I hadn't tested the ISR vblank bit behaviour
properly on non-PCH platforms. It doesn't actually work the way
we want, so there are patches in my latest vblank timestamp series
that kill the ISR parts and add a kludge to work around the scanline
counter's silly behaviour.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:52 PM, <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Gen2 doesn't have the pixelcount register that gen3 and gen4 have.
> > Instead we must use the scanline counter like we do for ctg+.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 63a9642..3c31a2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static u32 gm45_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> > return I915_READ(reg);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool g4x_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> > +static bool intel_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > uint32_t status;
> > @@ -603,7 +603,13 @@ static bool g4x_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> > I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
> >
> > return I915_READ(VLV_ISR) & status;
> > - } else if (IS_G4X(dev)) {
> > + } else if (IS_GEN2(dev)) {
> > + status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
> > + I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
> > + I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
> > +
> > + return I915_READ16(ISR) & status;
> > + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5) {
> > status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
> > I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
> > I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
> > @@ -658,11 +664,14 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> >
> > ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID | DRM_SCANOUTPOS_ACCURATE;
> >
> > - if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> > + if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> > /* No obvious pixelcount register. Only query vertical
> > * scanout position from Display scan line register.
> > */
> > - position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & 0x1fff;
> > + if (IS_GEN2(dev))
> > + position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN2;
> > + else
> > + position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
> >
> > /*
> > * The scanline counter increments at the leading edge
> > @@ -671,7 +680,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> > * to get a more accurate picture whether we're in vblank
> > * or not.
> > */
> > - in_vbl = g4x_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
> > + in_vbl = intel_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
> > if ((in_vbl && position == vbl_start - 1) ||
> > (!in_vbl && position == vbl_end - 1))
> > position = (position + 1) % vtotal;
> > @@ -701,7 +710,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> > else
> > position += vtotal - vbl_end;
> >
> > - if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> > + if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> > *vpos = position;
> > *hpos = 0;
> > } else {
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Vivi
> Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-06 13:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-11 18:52 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff ville.syrjala
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix gen2 scanout position readout ville.syrjala
2013-11-06 12:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-11-06 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-10-11 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't pretend that gen2 has a hardware frame counter ville.syrjala
2013-10-14 10:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Gen2 vblank stuff Chris Wilson
2013-10-14 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox