From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915, debugfs: Fix uninitialized warning Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:25:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20131121162535.GK26009@pd.tnic> References: <1385048986-14478-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Weinberger Cc: LKML , Borislav Petkov , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, DRI mailing list List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > index 6ed45a984230..1191aa47adc9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > @@ -2347,7 +2347,7 @@ static int pipe_crc_set_source(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe, > > { > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > struct intel_pipe_crc *pipe_crc = &dev_priv->pipe_crc[pipe]; > > - u32 val; > > + u32 val = 0; /* shut up gcc */ > > Wouldn't it be better to use uninitialized_var() here? I remember Linus' rant about this macro so that's why I don't use it anymore. In this specific case, it doesn't matter whichever we do so I'll let the maintainer make a wish :) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --