From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915: use the correct force_wake
 function at the PC8 code
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:23:51 +0100
Message-ID: <20131129132351.GU27344@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1385048853-1579-3-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<1385582240-2213-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<20131129111441.GB23993@bratislava.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com (mail-ea0-f174.google.com
	[209.85.215.174])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61103FAB57
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id b10so6726917eae.33
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131129111441.GB23993@bratislava.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:14:41AM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
> 
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:57:20PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > 
> > When I submitted the first patch adding these force wake functions,
> > Chris Wilson observed that I was using the wrong functions, so I sent
> > a second version of the patch to correct this problem. The problem is
> > that v1 was merged instead of v2.
> > 
> > I was able to notice the problem when running the
> > debugfs-forcewake-user subtest of pm_pc8 from intel-gpu-tools.
> > 
> > V2: - Rebase on the FORCEWAKE_ALL change.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch