From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen
 memory quirk for gen2 platforms
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:12:13 +0200
Message-ID: <20131204151213.GW10036@intel.com>
References: <1386085793-317-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
	<1386085793-317-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
	<20131204090814.GA32218@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26637FAEE6
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed,  4 Dec 2013 07:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131204090814.GA32218@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> =

> * ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> =

> > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
> =

> I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my =

> mail from you so I'm not sure and I'd like to know whether all =

> feedback was addressed.

Actually this was mostly insipired by a private mail from hpa. I forgot
to reply to your mail, sorry about that.

But anyways, I think apart from your comment about the KB/MB macros,
the rest of the comments no longer apply. And as far as those macros
go, there seem to be similar macros already sprinkled around in various
places, so I'm not sure how big of a fallout we'd have if I just stick
them into kernel.h.

-- =

Ville Syrj=E4l=E4
Intel OTC