From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: fix VDD override off wait Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:47:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20131206114733.24b9d149@jbarnes-desktop> References: <1386358364-1539-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <1386358364-1539-4-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from alt-proxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com [66.147.240.26]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A63ADFA2CE for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:45:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1386358364-1539-4-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Paulo Zanoni Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:32:42 -0200 Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > If we're disabling the VDD override bit and the panel is enabled, we > don't need to wait for anything. If the panel is disabled, then we > need to actually wait for panel_power_cycle_delay, not > panel_power_down_delay, because the power down delay was already > respected when we disabled the panel. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index fe327ce..a2aace2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -1142,7 +1142,9 @@ static void ironlake_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > /* Make sure sequencer is idle before allowing subsequent activity */ > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PP_STATUS: 0x%08x PP_CONTROL: 0x%08x\n", > I915_READ(pp_stat_reg), I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg)); > - msleep(intel_dp->panel_power_down_delay); > + > + if ((pp & POWER_TARGET_ON) == 0) > + msleep(intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay); > } > } > Lemme check the eDP docs on this one... it's supposed to be T12, which is the time between power cycles. Yeah that matches what we're using elsewhere, so: Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center