From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce vblank work function Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20131206120653.GI27344@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1372975631-13163-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <1373014131-16919-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72E1FBB78 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 04:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e53so255908eek.1 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:06:06 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: "Bloomfield, Jon" Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:44:15AM +0000, Bloomfield, Jon wrote: > What's the status of this patch ? I can't find any subsequent mention of > it, but we currently use it in one of our Android development trees. I'm > trying to work out whether to retain it or replace it. > > Was it killed off, or is it still in the pipeline ? Stalled atm I think. The overall concept of a vblank worker/timer support code is still useful imo. I think I've written up all the bikesheds Chris&I discussed on irc in my other reply. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch