From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/ppgtt: Prevent NULL deref in reset ioctl
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:21:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220182127.GA1204@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131220141044.GA23400@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 07:05:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Ben Widawsky
> > > <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > ctx = i915_gem_context_get(file->driver_priv, args->ctx_id);
> > > > - if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ctx)) {
> > >
> > > We now have half the callers check for IS_ERR and the others not.
> > > Afaics i915_gem_context_get can only return NULL or a real context
> > > though. Also from a quite read the expected error for a lookup failure
> > > is ENOENT (and there seems to be a testcase for this).
> > > -Daniel
> >
> >
> > To your first point:
> > I think checking null is always the right thing currently, but for
> > future proofing, IS_ERR_OR_NULL is really the right thing. After his
> > patch, I believe only i915_gem_context_destroy_ioctl is still incorrect.
>
> Using IS_ERR_OR_NULL on a return value which can never contain an
> encoded errno value is imo confusing, more so when it's inconsitently
> applied.
>
> > To the second:
> > This is only based on my memory, so feel free to change whatever you
> > need. When I retuned -ENXIO, the test failed.
> >
> > It should be:
> > return ctx ? PTR_ERR(ctx) : -ENOENT;
>
> On a cursory read that's been the semantics before your patch. And there
> seems to be a testcase in gem_reset_stat for this, have you run all
> subtests?
As I mentioned on IRC, but I think you missed it - a later subtest hits
a really bad BUG (pre-ppgtt). It was all pass up to that subtest.
>
> > I had
> > return ctx ? PTR_ERR(ctx) : -ENXIO;
> > which made the subtest fail. However, as we've noted, this itself was
> > not correct. Try the return above.
>
> Thanks, Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-19 23:22 [PATCH] drm/i915/ppgtt: Prevent NULL deref in reset ioctl Ben Widawsky
2013-12-20 6:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-20 6:55 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-20 14:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-20 14:37 ` Jani Nikula
2013-12-20 18:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-20 18:21 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-12-22 20:55 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/ppgtt: Never return a NULL context Ben Widawsky
2014-01-01 5:46 ` [PATCH] [v2] " Ben Widawsky
2014-01-02 14:34 ` Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220182127.GA1204@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox