From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: Supporting fused display configurations v4 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:55:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20140107165501.GH21071@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1389035849-20563-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <20140107080710.GF4770@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52007FAC35 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 08:55:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140107080710.GF4770@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:07:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > - Quick! Merge patch 3 before it conflicts and someone needs to review > > that giant thing again! > > As long as topic/ppgtt is still hanging out there and not yet merged into > dinq that can't happen due to conflict galore. And since there are still > some regressions pending that'll take a while. > > Please don't blame me for this mess, I never really liked this approach of > merging ppgtt ... I don't mind rebasing those patches and be second to ppggt in the queue, that makes quite a bit of sense priority wise. They are also quite easy to rebase. We may still be able to merge patches 01,02,06 and 12 so I only have to rebase the remaining ones. -- Damien