From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Export interval_tree Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20140126135444.GR9772@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1390316872-15887-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <1390739073-4519-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B089F9FB2 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:54:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r15so1835087ead.13 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:54:48 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1390739073-4519-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Michel Lespinasse List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:24:33PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > lib/interval_tree.c provides a simple interface for an interval-tree > (an augmented red-black tree) but is only built when testing the generic > macros for building interval-trees. For drivers with modest needs, > export the simple interval-tree library as is. > > v2: Lots of help from Michel Lespinasse to only compile the code > as required: > - make INTERVAL_TREE a config option > - make INTERVAL_TREE_TEST select the library functions > and sanitize the filenames & Makefile > - prepare interval_tree for being built as a module if required > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: Michel Lespinasse > Cc: Rik van Riel > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli > Cc: David Woodhouse > Cc: Andrew Morton > --- [snip] > diff --git a/lib/interval_tree.c b/lib/interval_tree.c > index e6eb406f2d65..e4109f624e51 100644 > --- a/lib/interval_tree.c > +++ b/lib/interval_tree.c > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #define START(node) ((node)->start) > #define LAST(node) ((node)->last) > @@ -8,3 +9,8 @@ > INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct interval_tree_node, rb, > unsigned long, __subtree_last, > START, LAST,, interval_tree) > + > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_insert); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_remove); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_iter_first); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_iter_next); Hm, I've thought kernel coding style nowadays is to put the EXPORT_SYMBOL right below the definition of the function? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch