From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add Baytrail PSR Support.
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:20:08 +0100
Message-ID: <20140129192008.GJ7444@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1390938445-4666-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
	<1390999674-7982-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
	<20140129131251.GA28110@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
	<CABVU7+sniPqtsLYCrVYd0q+80jQVpaaa5WpLs0Si_HeoEpMFYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140129132755.GD28110@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
	<CABVU7+v7NPpUt=eWzaa2X5DTmV+tQcnXJpSFteAvy9MsA9sg=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140129140227.GE28110@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
	<CABVU7+toPPTk4-0K8m7PiVUt=hYo4PuzJzV046cF_5Fb7x=wOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140129142603.GF28110@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2C2FCB57
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e49so1142024eek.28
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140129142603.GF28110@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:26:03PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:23:15PM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > ok, got it.
> > 
> > So, the correct here is to remove inactivate from set_domain and add
> > gem_bo_busy call on MMAP_GTT testcase?
> 
> That would match what we should do today. It's just whether we take the
> opportunity to define a consistent behaviour...

Afaik we don't do a gem_bo_busy after gtt access, at least no everwhere.
Which sucks, but meh. At least I've thought that the busy is just after
gpu rendering.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch