From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory
 quirk for gen2 platforms
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:02:05 +0100
Message-ID: <20140204130205.GR17001@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1386085793-317-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 <1389108512-20039-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 <20140204124707.GG3891@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140204124707.GG3891@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote:
> Hi x86 folks,
>=20
> Ping on getting the gen2 stolen memory early quirk patches into the x=
86
> tree.
>=20
> From our side Daniel and Chris both seemed happy with them, so I'd li=
ke
> to get them in at some point.

Yup, I think this is ready for 3.15. And since there's no direct depenc=
y
really between the i915 parts and the x86 early reserve stuff they can =
go
both in through relevant trees - i915 will simply fail the stolen setup=
 if
the range isn't properly reserved.

A stable branch somewhere would be good though so that I can pull it in=
to
our integration tree for testing.
-Daniel
--=20
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch