public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:29:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140212092920.GA3891@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140211230131.GA6449@bwidawsk.net>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:01:31PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:22:37PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:11:04PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > > > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception
> > > > > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define
> > > > > your own space, somewhere in the GTT.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should
> > > > > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms
> > > > > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc).
> > > > > 
> > > > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided
> > > > > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins
> > > > > with cache locality, but that's all speculative.
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris)
> > > > > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |   1 +
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         |   5 +-
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |  38 +++++-
> > > > >  4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	struct pci_dev *bridge_dev;
> > > > >  	struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> > > > > +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj;
> > > > >  	uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah;
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
> > > > >  #define   MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19)
> > > > >  #define   MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C  (4 << 19)
> > > > >  #define   MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19)
> > > > > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX	MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */
> > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX	MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */
> > > > >  #define   MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT    (1<<22)
> > > > >  #define   MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE	    (1<<21)
> > > > >  #define   MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE	    (1<<20)
> > > > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@
> > > > >  #define   MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN	(1<<2)
> > > > >  #define   MI_FORCE_RESTORE		(1<<1)
> > > > >  #define   MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT		(1<<0)
> > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL	MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */
> > > > > +#define   MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine)	((engine)<<15)
> > > > >  #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM	MI_INSTR(0x20, 1)
> > > > >  #define   MI_MEM_VIRTUAL	(1 << 22) /* 965+ only */
> > > > >  #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX	MI_INSTR(0x21, 1)
> > > > > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@
> > > > >  #define   PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE		(1<<10) /* GM45+ only */
> > > > >  #define   PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE		(1<<9)
> > > > >  #define   PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY				(1<<8)
> > > > > +#define   PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE			(1<<7) /* gen7+ */
> > > > >  #define   PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE		(1<<4)
> > > > >  #define   PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE		(1<<3)
> > > > >  #define   PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE		(1<<2)
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > > > > index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > > > > @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> > > > >  static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
> > > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) {
> > > > > +		i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj);
> > > > > +		drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base);
> > > > > +		dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL;
> > > > > +	}
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL)
> > > > >  		return;
> > > > > @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> > > > >  	ring->scratch.obj = NULL;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
> > > > > +			   unsigned int num_dwords)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8
> > > > > +	struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev;
> > > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > > +	struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter;
> > > > > +	int i, ret, num_rings;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask);
> > > > > +	num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS;
> > > > 
> > > > Again num_dwords +=
> > > > 
> > > > > +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* XXX: + 4 for the caller */
> > > > > +	ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4);
> > > > 
> > > > and the +4 goes away.
> > > > 
> > > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > > +		return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) {
> > > > > +		u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i];
> > > > > +		if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6));
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB |
> > > > > +					   PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE |
> > > > > +					   PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE);
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset));
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset));
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL |
> > > > > +					   MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id));
> > > > > +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	WARN_ON(i != num_rings);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > 
> > > > <snip>
> > > 
> > > Got those, thanks.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> > > > > index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> > > > > @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct  intel_ring_buffer {
> > > > >  #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2
> > > > >  	void		(*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +	/* GEN8 signal/wait table
> > > > > +	 *	  signal to  signal to    signal to   signal to
> > > > > +	 *	    RCS         VCS          BCS        VECS
> > > > > +	 *      ------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *  RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *  VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *  BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) |  NOP (0x78) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *
> > > > > +	 * Generalization:
> > > > > +	 *  f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id)
> > > > > +	 *  ie. transpose of g(x, y)
> > > > > +	 *
> > > > > +	 *	 sync from   sync from    sync from    sync from
> > > > > +	 *	    RCS         VCS          BCS        VECS
> > > > > +	 *      ------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *  RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *  VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *  BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) |  NOP (0x78) |
> > > > > +	 *	|-----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > +	 *
> > > > > +	 * Generalization:
> > > > > +	 *  g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id)
> > > > > +	 *  ie. transpose of f(x, y)
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > >  	struct {
> > > > >  		u32	sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1];
> > > > >  		/* AKA wait() */
> > > > > @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct  intel_ring_buffer {
> > > > >  		/* our mbox written by others */
> > > > >  		u32		mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> > > > 
> > > > mbox should also get a u64 friend, right?
> > > 
> > > mbox should be gen6 only, given the change to using the gtt on gen8. In
> > > this point in the series, semaphores should be forcibly disabled on
> > > gen8, so the code looks wrong, but the path cannot [should not] be
> > > taken.
> > > 
> > > I suppose I should kill the initialization of mbox for gen8, or somehow
> > > consolidate with a union to prevent confusion.
> > > 
> > 
> > Just to clarify it should be
> > 
> > gen6:
> > signal uses signal_mbox for signal
> > wait uses mbox
> > 
> > gen8:
> > signal uses signal_ggtt for signal
> > wait uses arithmetic to figure out the offset
> > 
> 
> Ok, I've fixed this up to make things clearer, but it ends up in the
> next patch. So look there when I repost.

I was confused by these:
+ ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(ring, RCS);

So you did store the wait offset into mbox, but then you didn't use the
precomputed values and instead recomputed on the spot in gen8
ring_sync().


> 
> > > > 
> > > > >  		/* mboxes this ring signals to */
> > > > > -		u32		signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> > > > > +		union {
> > > > > +			u32		signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> > > > > +			u64		signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> > > > > +		};
> > > > >  
> > > > >  		/* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */
> > > > >  		int		(*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > 1.8.5.3
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel OTC
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> -- 
> Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-12  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-29 19:55 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] Broadwell HW semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 11:25   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-11 16:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 17:13       ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-11 20:20   ` [PATCH] [v2] " Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 20:53     ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-11 21:50       ` Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 12:38   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-30 12:46     ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-30 13:18       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-30 13:25         ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-30 13:35         ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-11 21:48           ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 22:23             ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-11 22:25               ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 22:28                 ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-11 22:11     ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 22:22       ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 23:01         ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-12  9:29           ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 12:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 13:26   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 14:53   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-30 14:58     ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-12  0:19       ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-12  0:23     ` Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-20  6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky
2014-02-20  6:19 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2014-02-24 13:10   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-03-05 12:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-29 21:52 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140212092920.GA3891@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox