From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915: remove power_well->always_on flag Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:27:43 -0800 Message-ID: <20140220112743.0e1b1475@jbarnes-desktop> References: <1392674540-10915-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com> <1392674540-10915-7-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from alt-proxy71.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy71.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.195.104.6]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28B8AFB398 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:34:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1392674540-10915-7-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Imre Deak Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:02:07 +0200 Imre Deak wrote: > An always-on power well can be already recognized by the lack of > is_enabled handler, so just depend on that. Suggested by Daniel. > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 - > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 +---- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > index 8c8635e..eaa9210 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -1039,7 +1039,6 @@ struct i915_power_well_ops { > /* Power well structure for haswell */ > struct i915_power_well { > const char *name; > - bool always_on; > /* power well enable/disable usage count */ > int count; > unsigned long domains; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 7866426..faaa4ec 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -5200,7 +5200,7 @@ bool intel_display_power_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock); > for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT(domain), power_domains) { > - if (power_well->always_on) > + if (!power_well->ops->is_enabled) > continue; > > if (!power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, power_well)) { > @@ -5429,7 +5429,6 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_ops i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops = { }; > static struct i915_power_well i9xx_always_on_power_well[] = { > { > .name = "always-on", > - .always_on = 1, > .domains = POWER_DOMAIN_MASK, > .ops = &i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops, > }, > @@ -5445,7 +5444,6 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_ops hsw_power_well_ops = { > static struct i915_power_well hsw_power_wells[] = { > { > .name = "always-on", > - .always_on = 1, > .domains = HSW_ALWAYS_ON_POWER_DOMAINS, > .ops = &i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops, > }, > @@ -5459,7 +5457,6 @@ static struct i915_power_well hsw_power_wells[] = { > static struct i915_power_well bdw_power_wells[] = { > { > .name = "always-on", > - .always_on = 1, > .domains = BDW_ALWAYS_ON_POWER_DOMAINS, > .ops = &i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops, > }, As in the previous mail, I think I'd prefer a no-op function that just returns true instead, but meh. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center