* [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct
@ 2014-02-20 6:19 Ben Widawsky
2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky
` (12 more replies)
0 siblings, 13 replies; 36+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky
This will be helpful in abstracting some of the code in preparation for
gen8 semaphores.
v2: Move mbox stuff to a separate struct
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 10 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 6 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 19 ++++---
4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3618bb0..2981826 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2089,8 +2089,8 @@ i915_gem_init_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 seqno)
for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) {
intel_ring_init_seqno(ring, seqno);
- for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ring->sync_seqno); j++)
- ring->sync_seqno[j] = 0;
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ring->semaphore.sync_seqno); j++)
+ ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[j] = 0;
}
return 0;
@@ -2661,7 +2661,7 @@ i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
idx = intel_ring_sync_index(from, to);
seqno = obj->last_read_seqno;
- if (seqno <= from->sync_seqno[idx])
+ if (seqno <= from->semaphore.sync_seqno[idx])
return 0;
ret = i915_gem_check_olr(obj->ring, seqno);
@@ -2669,13 +2669,13 @@ i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
return ret;
trace_i915_gem_ring_sync_to(from, to, seqno);
- ret = to->sync_to(to, from, seqno);
+ ret = to->semaphore.sync_to(to, from, seqno);
if (!ret)
/* We use last_read_seqno because sync_to()
* might have just caused seqno wrap under
* the radar.
*/
- from->sync_seqno[idx] = obj->last_read_seqno;
+ from->semaphore.sync_seqno[idx] = obj->last_read_seqno;
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 000b369..bcab114 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -810,14 +810,14 @@ static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev,
= I915_READ(RING_SYNC_0(ring->mmio_base));
ering->semaphore_mboxes[1]
= I915_READ(RING_SYNC_1(ring->mmio_base));
- ering->semaphore_seqno[0] = ring->sync_seqno[0];
- ering->semaphore_seqno[1] = ring->sync_seqno[1];
+ ering->semaphore_seqno[0] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[0];
+ ering->semaphore_seqno[1] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[1];
}
if (HAS_VEBOX(dev)) {
ering->semaphore_mboxes[2] =
I915_READ(RING_SYNC_2(ring->mmio_base));
- ering->semaphore_seqno[2] = ring->sync_seqno[2];
+ ering->semaphore_seqno[2] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[2];
}
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index b340c75..626019a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) {
for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
- u32 mbox_reg = ring->signal_mbox[i];
+ u32 mbox_reg = ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[i];
if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC)
update_mboxes(ring, mbox_reg);
}
@@ -711,10 +711,11 @@ gen6_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter,
struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
u32 seqno)
{
- int ret;
u32 dw1 = MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX |
MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE |
MI_SEMAPHORE_REGISTER;
+ u32 wait_mbox = signaller->semaphore.mbox.wait[waiter->id];
+ int ret;
/* Throughout all of the GEM code, seqno passed implies our current
* seqno is >= the last seqno executed. However for hardware the
@@ -722,8 +723,7 @@ gen6_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter,
*/
seqno -= 1;
- WARN_ON(signaller->semaphore_register[waiter->id] ==
- MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID);
+ WARN_ON(wait_mbox == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID);
ret = intel_ring_begin(waiter, 4);
if (ret)
@@ -731,9 +731,7 @@ gen6_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter,
/* If seqno wrap happened, omit the wait with no-ops */
if (likely(!i915_gem_has_seqno_wrapped(waiter->dev, seqno))) {
- intel_ring_emit(waiter,
- dw1 |
- signaller->semaphore_register[waiter->id]);
+ intel_ring_emit(waiter, dw1 | wait_mbox);
intel_ring_emit(waiter, seqno);
intel_ring_emit(waiter, 0);
intel_ring_emit(waiter, MI_NOOP);
@@ -1331,7 +1329,8 @@ static int intel_init_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->active_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->request_list);
ring->size = 32 * PAGE_SIZE;
- memset(ring->sync_seqno, 0, sizeof(ring->sync_seqno));
+ memset(ring->semaphore.sync_seqno, 0,
+ sizeof(ring->semaphore.sync_seqno));
init_waitqueue_head(&ring->irq_queue);
@@ -1881,15 +1880,15 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT;
ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno;
ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno;
- ring->sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
- ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
- ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV;
- ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB;
- ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RVE;
- ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_VRSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_BRSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_VERSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RVE;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VRSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BRSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VERSYNC;
} else if (IS_GEN5(dev)) {
ring->add_request = pc_render_add_request;
ring->flush = gen4_render_ring_flush;
@@ -2057,15 +2056,15 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->dispatch_execbuffer =
gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
- ring->sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
- ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR;
- ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
- ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB;
- ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE;
- ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC;
} else {
ring->mmio_base = BSD_RING_BASE;
ring->flush = bsd_ring_flush;
@@ -2114,15 +2113,15 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq;
ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
- ring->sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
- ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR;
- ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV;
- ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
- ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE;
- ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC;
ring->init = init_ring_common;
return intel_init_ring_buffer(dev, ring);
@@ -2155,15 +2154,15 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->irq_put = hsw_vebox_put_irq;
ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
- ring->sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
- ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER;
- ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV;
- ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB;
- ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
- ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC;
- ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC;
+ ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
ring->init = init_ring_common;
return intel_init_ring_buffer(dev, ring);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 08b91c6..8e03c4c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer {
unsigned irq_refcount; /* protected by dev_priv->irq_lock */
u32 irq_enable_mask; /* bitmask to enable ring interrupt */
u32 trace_irq_seqno;
- u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1];
bool __must_check (*irq_get)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
void (*irq_put)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
@@ -113,14 +112,20 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer {
#define I915_DISPATCH_SECURE 0x1
#define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2
void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
- int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
+
+ struct {
+ u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1];
+ /* AKA wait() */
+ int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
struct intel_ring_buffer *to,
u32 seqno);
-
- /* our mbox written by others */
- u32 semaphore_register[I915_NUM_RINGS];
- /* mboxes this ring signals to */
- u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS];
+ struct {
+ /* our mbox written by others */
+ u32 wait[I915_NUM_RINGS];
+ /* mboxes this ring signals to */
+ u32 signal[I915_NUM_RINGS];
+ } mbox;
+ } semaphore;
/**
* List of objects currently involved in rendering from the
--
1.9.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky ` (11 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky This abstraction again is in preparation for gen8. Gen8 will bring new semantics for doing this operation. While here, make the writes of MI_NOOPs explicit for non-existent rings. This should have been implicit before. NOTE: This is going to be removed in a few patches. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 11 +++++---- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 626019a..558bddf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -634,20 +634,32 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) ring->scratch.obj = NULL; } -static void -update_mboxes(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, - u32 mmio_offset) +static void gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller) { + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = signaller->dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; + int i; + /* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying number * of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update to a * multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of 2) * even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords. */ #define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4 - intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1)); - intel_ring_emit(ring, mmio_offset); - intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno); - intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP); + for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { + u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.mbox.signal[i]; + if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC) { + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); + } else { + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); + } + } } /** @@ -663,9 +675,7 @@ static int gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) { struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; - int i, ret, num_dwords = 4; + int ret, num_dwords = 4; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS); @@ -675,13 +685,7 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) if (ret) return ret; - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { - u32 mbox_reg = ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[i]; - if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC) - update_mboxes(ring, mbox_reg); - } - } + ring->semaphore.signal(ring); intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX); intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT); @@ -1881,6 +1885,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB; @@ -2057,6 +2062,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; } ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; @@ -2114,6 +2120,7 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; } ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; @@ -2155,6 +2162,7 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; } ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index 8e03c4c..d270323 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -115,16 +115,19 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { struct { u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; - /* AKA wait() */ - int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, - struct intel_ring_buffer *to, - u32 seqno); + struct { /* our mbox written by others */ u32 wait[I915_NUM_RINGS]; /* mboxes this ring signals to */ u32 signal[I915_NUM_RINGS]; } mbox; + + /* AKA wait() */ + int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, + struct intel_ring_buffer *to, + u32 seqno); + void (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller); } semaphore; /** -- 1.9.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky ` (10 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Add_request has always contained both the semaphore mailbox updates as well as the breadcrumb writes. Since the semaphore signal is the one which actually knows about the number of dwords it needs to emit to the ring, we move the ring_begin to that function. This allows us to remove the hideously shared #define On a related not, gen8 will use a different number of dwords for semaphores, but not for add request. v2: Make number of dwords an explicit part of signalling (via function argument). (Chris) v3: very slight comment change Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 558bddf..06d849a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -634,18 +634,28 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) ring->scratch.obj = NULL; } -static void gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller) +static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) { - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = signaller->dev->dev_private; + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; - int i; + int i, ret; -/* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying number - * of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update to a - * multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of 2) - * even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords. - */ + /* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying + * number of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update + * to a multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of + * 2) even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords. + */ #define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4 + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) + num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS); + + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords); + if (ret) + return ret; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.mbox.signal[i]; if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC) { @@ -660,6 +670,8 @@ static void gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller) intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); } } + + return 0; } /** @@ -674,19 +686,12 @@ static void gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller) static int gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) { - struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; - int ret, num_dwords = 4; - - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) - num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS); -#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + int ret; - ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, num_dwords); + ret = ring->semaphore.signal(ring, 4); if (ret) return ret; - ring->semaphore.signal(ring); - intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX); intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT); intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index d270323..36b4462 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, struct intel_ring_buffer *to, u32 seqno); - void (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller); + int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + /* num_dwords needed by caller */ + unsigned int num_dwords); } semaphore; /** -- 1.9.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:09 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky ` (9 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky With the ring mask we now have an easy way to know the number of rings in the system, and therefore can accurately predict the number of dwords to emit for semaphore signalling. This was not possible (easily) previously. There should be no functional impact, simply fewer instructions emitted. While we're here, simply do the round up to 2 instead of the fancier rounding we did before, which rounding up per mbox, ie 4. This also allows us to drop the unnecessary MI_NOOP, so not really 4, 3. v2: Use 3 dwords instead of 4 (Ville) Do the proper calculation to get the number of dwords to emit (Ville) Conditionally set .sync_to when semaphores are enabled (Ville) Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 06d849a..bf061dd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -637,24 +637,19 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, unsigned int num_dwords) { +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 3 struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; - int i, ret; + int i, ret, num_rings; - /* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying - * number of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update - * to a multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of - * 2) even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords. - */ -#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4 - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) - num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS); + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords += round_up((num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS, 2); +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords); if (ret) return ret; -#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.mbox.signal[i]; @@ -662,15 +657,13 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1)); intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg); intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); - intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); - } else { - intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); - intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); - intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); - intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); } } + /* If num_dwords was rounded, make sure the tail pointer is correct */ + if (num_rings % 2 == 0) + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP); + return 0; } @@ -688,7 +681,11 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) { int ret; - ret = ring->semaphore.signal(ring, 4); + if (ring->semaphore.signal) + ret = ring->semaphore.signal(ring, 4); + else + ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4); + if (ret) return ret; @@ -1889,16 +1886,18 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RVE; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VRSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BRSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VERSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RVE; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VRSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BRSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VERSYNC; + } } else if (IS_GEN5(dev)) { ring->add_request = pc_render_add_request; ring->flush = gen4_render_ring_flush; @@ -2066,16 +2065,18 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; } - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC; + } } else { ring->mmio_base = BSD_RING_BASE; ring->flush = bsd_ring_flush; @@ -2124,16 +2125,18 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; } - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC; + } ring->init = init_ring_common; return intel_init_ring_buffer(dev, ring); @@ -2166,16 +2169,18 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = hsw_vebox_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; } - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + } ring->init = init_ring_common; return intel_init_ring_buffer(dev, ring); -- 1.9.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-24 13:09 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-02-24 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:17PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > With the ring mask we now have an easy way to know the number of rings > in the system, and therefore can accurately predict the number of dwords > to emit for semaphore signalling. This was not possible (easily) > previously. > > There should be no functional impact, simply fewer instructions emitted. > > While we're here, simply do the round up to 2 instead of the fancier > rounding we did before, which rounding up per mbox, ie 4. This also > allows us to drop the unnecessary MI_NOOP, so not really 4, 3. > > v2: Use 3 dwords instead of 4 (Ville) > Do the proper calculation to get the number of dwords to emit (Ville) > Conditionally set .sync_to when semaphores are enabled (Ville) > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 06d849a..bf061dd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -637,24 +637,19 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > unsigned int num_dwords) > { > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 3 > struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; > - int i, ret; > + int i, ret, num_rings; > > - /* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying > - * number of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update > - * to a multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of > - * 2) even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords. > - */ > -#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4 > - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) > - num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS); > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); hweight32() would be enough. <snip> -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky ` (8 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Gen8 has already had some differentiation with how it handles rings. Semaphores bring yet more differences, and now is as good a time as any to do the split. Also, since gen8 doesn't actually use semaphores up until this point, put the proper "NULL" values in for the mbox info. v2: v1 had a stale commit message v3: Move everything in the is_semaphore_enabled() check Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index bf061dd..691da67 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -1870,19 +1870,34 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->id = RCS; ring->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE; - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { + ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; + ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; + ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; + ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; + ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT; + ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; + ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + } + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; ring->flush = gen7_render_ring_flush; if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6) ring->flush = gen6_render_ring_flush; - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { - ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; - ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; - ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; - } else { - ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; - ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; - } + ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; + ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; @@ -1925,6 +1940,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT; } ring->write_tail = ring_write_tail; + if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = hsw_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; else if (IS_GEN8(dev)) @@ -2058,24 +2074,36 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; - } - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC; + } } } else { ring->mmio_base = BSD_RING_BASE; @@ -2119,23 +2147,35 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BLT_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; - } - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC; + } } ring->init = init_ring_common; @@ -2163,23 +2203,35 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->irq_get = hsw_vebox_get_irq; ring->irq_put = hsw_vebox_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; - } - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC; + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + } } ring->init = init_ring_common; -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-24 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-02-24 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:18PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Gen8 has already had some differentiation with how it handles rings. > Semaphores bring yet more differences, and now is as good a time as any > to do the split. > > Also, since gen8 doesn't actually use semaphores up until this point, > put the proper "NULL" values in for the mbox info. > > v2: v1 had a stale commit message > > v3: Move everything in the is_semaphore_enabled() check > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index bf061dd..691da67 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -1870,19 +1870,34 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) > ring->id = RCS; > ring->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE; > > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { > + ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; > + ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; > + ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; > + ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; > + ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT; > + ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; > + ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; Double assignment. > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + } > + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { > ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; > ring->flush = gen7_render_ring_flush; > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6) > ring->flush = gen6_render_ring_flush; > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { > - ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; > - ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; > - ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; > - } else { > - ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; > - ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; > - } > + ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; > + ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; > ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT; > ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; > ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; > @@ -1925,6 +1940,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) > ring->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT; > } > ring->write_tail = ring_write_tail; > + > if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = hsw_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > else if (IS_GEN8(dev)) > @@ -2058,24 +2074,36 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) > ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = > gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + } > } else { > ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT; > ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; > ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = > gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > - } > - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC; > + } > } > } else { > ring->mmio_base = BSD_RING_BASE; > @@ -2119,23 +2147,35 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) > ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; > ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + } > } else { > ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BLT_USER_INTERRUPT; > ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; > ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > - } > - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC; > + } > } > ring->init = init_ring_common; > > @@ -2163,23 +2203,35 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) > ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; > ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + } > } else { > ring->irq_enable_mask = PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT; > ring->irq_get = hsw_vebox_get_irq; > ring->irq_put = hsw_vebox_put_irq; > ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; > - } > - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC; > - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { > + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; > + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_RVESYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_VVESYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_BVESYNC; > + ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; > + } > } > ring->init = init_ring_common; > > -- > 1.9.0 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:10 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky ` (7 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define your own space, somewhere in the GTT. The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins with cache locality, but that's all speculative. v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) v3: Move the macros the ringbuffer.h to prevent churn in next patch (Ville) v4: Fixed compilation rebase conflict commit 1ec9e26ddab06459e89a890431b2de064c5d1056 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Fri Feb 14 14:01:11 2014 +0100 drm/i915: Consolidate binding parameters into flags Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 73 +++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 8c64831..028ce5a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1419,6 +1419,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 2f564ce..4e36d03 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) @@ -328,6 +330,7 @@ #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 691da67..717976b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -621,6 +621,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) { struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; + } if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) return; @@ -634,6 +641,85 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) ring->scratch.obj = NULL; } +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) +{ +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; + int i, ret, num_rings; + + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords += (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) + continue; + + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + } + + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); + + return 0; +} + +static int gen8_xcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) +{ +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 6 + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; + int i, ret, num_rings; + + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) + continue; + + intel_ring_emit(signaller, (MI_FLUSH_DW + 1) | + MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset) | + MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + } + + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); + + return 0; +} + static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, unsigned int num_dwords) { @@ -1865,12 +1951,30 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) { drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct intel_ring_buffer *ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS]; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; + int ret; ring->name = "render ring"; ring->id = RCS; ring->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE; if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(dev, 4096); + if (obj == NULL) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate semaphore bo. Disabling semaphores\n"); + i915.semaphores = 0; + } else { + i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, I915_CACHE_LLC); + ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(obj, 0, PIN_NONBLOCK); + if (ret != 0) { + drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base); + DRM_ERROR("Failed to pin semaphore bo. Disabling semaphores\n"); + i915.semaphores = 0; + } else + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = obj; + } + } ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; @@ -1879,17 +1983,10 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + BUG_ON(!dev_priv->semaphore_obj); ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_rcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; @@ -1958,9 +2055,6 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) /* Workaround batchbuffer to combat CS tlb bug. */ if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev)) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; - int ret; - obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(dev, I830_BATCH_LIMIT); if (obj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate batch bo\n"); @@ -2076,15 +2170,8 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT; @@ -2149,15 +2236,8 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BLT_USER_INTERRUPT; @@ -2205,15 +2285,8 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index 36b4462..38a50c3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -33,6 +33,31 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { #define I915_READ_IMR(ring) I915_READ(RING_IMR((ring)->mmio_base)) #define I915_WRITE_IMR(ring, val) I915_WRITE(RING_IMR((ring)->mmio_base), val) +/* seqno size is actually only a uint32, but since we plan to use MI_FLUSH_DW to + * do the writes, and that must have qw aligned offsets, simply pretend it's 8b. + */ +#define i915_semaphore_seqno_size sizeof(uint64_t) +#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(to) \ + (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ + (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ + (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (to))) + +#define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(from) \ + (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ + ((from) * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ + (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * ring->id)) + +#define GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT do { \ + if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ + break; \ + } \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(RCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(BCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VECS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[ring->id] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; \ + } while(0) + enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action { HANGCHECK_IDLE = 0, HANGCHECK_WAIT, @@ -113,15 +138,51 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); + /* GEN8 signal/wait table + * signal to signal to signal to signal to + * RCS VCS BCS VECS + * ------------------------------------------------------ + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * + * Generalization: + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) + * + * sync from sync from sync from sync from + * RCS VCS BCS VECS + * ------------------------------------------------------ + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * + * Generalization: + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) + */ struct { u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; - struct { - /* our mbox written by others */ - u32 wait[I915_NUM_RINGS]; - /* mboxes this ring signals to */ - u32 signal[I915_NUM_RINGS]; - } mbox; + union { + struct { + /* our mbox written by others */ + u32 wait[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + /* mboxes this ring signals to */ + u32 signal[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + } mbox; + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + }; /* AKA wait() */ int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-24 13:10 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-03-05 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-02-24 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:19PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: <snip> > @@ -634,6 +641,85 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > } > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > + unsigned int num_dwords) > +{ > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > + int i, ret, num_rings; > + > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); Again hweight32() would be enough. <snip> -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-24 13:10 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-03-05 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-03-05 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:19PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > <snip> > > @@ -634,6 +641,85 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > } > > > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > + unsigned int num_dwords) > > +{ > > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > > + int i, ret, num_rings; > > + > > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); > > Again hweight32() would be enough. And I noticed there's even a hweight8() if we want to micro optimize, but I don't really care that much, so even leaving these as hweight_long() is fine by me. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky ` (6 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Semaphore waits use a new instruction, MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT. The seqno to wait on is all well defined by the table in the previous patch. There is nothing else different from previous GEN's semaphore synchronization code. v2: Update macros to not require the other ring's ring->id (Chris) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 4e36d03..d02b856 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -242,6 +242,9 @@ #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ #define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT MI_INSTR(0x1c, 2) /* GEN8+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL (1<<15) +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD (1<<12) #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 717976b..3d5dd4a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -798,6 +798,31 @@ static inline bool i915_gem_has_seqno_wrapped(struct drm_device *dev, * @signaller - ring which has, or will signal * @seqno - seqno which the waiter will block on */ + +static int +gen8_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter, + struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + u32 seqno) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = waiter->dev->dev_private; + int ret; + + ret = intel_ring_begin(waiter, 4); + if (ret) + return ret; + + intel_ring_emit(waiter, MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT | + MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT | + MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD); + intel_ring_emit(waiter, seqno); + intel_ring_emit(waiter, + lower_32_bits(GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(waiter, signaller->id))); + intel_ring_emit(waiter, + upper_32_bits(GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(waiter, signaller->id))); + intel_ring_advance(waiter); + return 0; +} + static int gen6_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter, struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, @@ -1984,7 +2009,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { BUG_ON(!dev_priv->semaphore_obj); - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen8_ring_sync; ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_rcs_signal; GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } @@ -2169,7 +2194,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen8_ring_sync; ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } @@ -2235,7 +2260,7 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen8_ring_sync; ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } @@ -2284,7 +2309,7 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { - ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; + ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen8_ring_sync; ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index 38a50c3..5d56c95 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (to))) -#define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(from) \ +#define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(__ring, from) \ (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ ((from) * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ - (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * ring->id)) + (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (__ring)->id)) #define GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT do { \ if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky ` (5 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 3d5dd4a..5f7bee8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ gen8_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter, intel_ring_emit(waiter, MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT | MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT | + MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL | MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD); intel_ring_emit(waiter, seqno); intel_ring_emit(waiter, -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-24 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-02-24 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:21PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 3d5dd4a..5f7bee8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ gen8_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter, > > intel_ring_emit(waiter, MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT | > MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT | > + MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL | I discussed this on irc w/ Ben, and I was suggesting we don't need to poll. Polling apparently can be used as a workaround for certain hardware issues, but it looks like those issues shouldn't affect us, for the momemnt at least. So my suggestion was to try w/o polling first (since there could be some power cost to polling) and add the poll bit if problems arise. > MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD); > intel_ring_emit(waiter, seqno); > intel_ring_emit(waiter, > -- > 1.9.0 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky ` (4 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c index bcab114..2b64493 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c @@ -797,6 +797,22 @@ i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, return NULL; } +static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, + struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) +{ + ering->semaphore_mboxes[0] = I915_READ(RING_SYNC_0(ring->mmio_base)); + ering->semaphore_mboxes[1] = I915_READ(RING_SYNC_1(ring->mmio_base)); + ering->semaphore_seqno[0] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[0]; + ering->semaphore_seqno[1] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[1]; + + if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv->dev)) { + ering->semaphore_mboxes[2] = + I915_READ(RING_SYNC_2(ring->mmio_base)); + ering->semaphore_seqno[2] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[2]; + } +} + static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) @@ -806,18 +822,7 @@ static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { ering->rc_psmi = I915_READ(ring->mmio_base + 0x50); ering->fault_reg = I915_READ(RING_FAULT_REG(ring)); - ering->semaphore_mboxes[0] - = I915_READ(RING_SYNC_0(ring->mmio_base)); - ering->semaphore_mboxes[1] - = I915_READ(RING_SYNC_1(ring->mmio_base)); - ering->semaphore_seqno[0] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[0]; - ering->semaphore_seqno[1] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[1]; - } - - if (HAS_VEBOX(dev)) { - ering->semaphore_mboxes[2] = - I915_READ(RING_SYNC_2(ring->mmio_base)); - ering->semaphore_seqno[2] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[2]; + gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); } if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) { -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:08 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 Ben Widawsky ` (3 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Since the semaphore information is in an object, just dump it, and let the user parse it later. NOTE: The page being used for the semaphores are incoherent with the CPU. No matter what I do, I cannot figure out a way to read anything but 0s. Note that the semaphore waits are indeed working. v2: Don't print signal, and wait (they should be the same). Instead, print sync_seqno (Chris) v3: Free the semaphore error object (Chris) v4: Fix semaphore offset calculation during error state collection (Ville) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 12 ++++---- 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 028ce5a..9b86874 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state { u64 fence[I915_MAX_NUM_FENCES]; struct intel_overlay_error_state *overlay; struct intel_display_error_state *display; + struct drm_i915_error_object *semaphore_obj; struct drm_i915_error_ring { bool valid; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c index 2b64493..25fc2ea 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, struct drm_device *dev = error_priv->dev; drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct drm_i915_error_state *error = error_priv->error; + struct drm_i915_error_object *obj; int i, j, page, offset, elt; if (!error) { @@ -360,8 +361,6 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, error->pinned_bo_count[0]); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(error->ring); i++) { - struct drm_i915_error_object *obj; - if ((obj = error->ring[i].batchbuffer)) { err_printf(m, "%s --- gtt_offset = 0x%08x\n", dev_priv->ring[i].name, @@ -436,6 +435,19 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, } } + obj = error->semaphore_obj; + if (obj) { + err_printf(m, "Semaphore page = 0x%08x\n", obj->gtt_offset); + for (elt = 0; elt < PAGE_SIZE/16; elt += 4) { + err_printf(m, "[%04x] %08x %08x %08x %08x\n", + elt * 4, + obj->pages[0][elt], + obj->pages[0][elt+1], + obj->pages[0][elt+2], + obj->pages[0][elt+3]); + } + } + if (error->overlay) intel_overlay_print_error_state(m, error->overlay); @@ -506,6 +518,7 @@ static void i915_error_state_free(struct kref *error_ref) kfree(error->ring[i].requests); } + i915_error_object_free(error->semaphore_obj); kfree(error->active_bo); kfree(error->overlay); kfree(error->display); @@ -797,6 +810,33 @@ i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, return NULL; } +static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct drm_i915_error_state *error, + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, + struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) +{ + struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; + int i; + + if (!i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev_priv->dev)) + return; + + if (!error->semaphore_obj) + error->semaphore_obj = + i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, + dev_priv->semaphore_obj, + &dev_priv->gtt.base); + + for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { + u16 signal_offset = + (GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, i) / 4) & PAGE_MASK; + u32 *tmp = error->semaphore_obj->pages[0]; + + ering->semaphore_mboxes[i] = tmp[signal_offset]; + ering->semaphore_seqno[i] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[i]; + } +} + static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) @@ -814,6 +854,7 @@ static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, } static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, + struct drm_i915_error_state *error, struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) { @@ -822,7 +863,10 @@ static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { ering->rc_psmi = I915_READ(ring->mmio_base + 0x50); ering->fault_reg = I915_READ(RING_FAULT_REG(ring)); - gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) + gen8_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, error, ring, ering); + else + gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); } if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) { @@ -948,7 +992,7 @@ static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct drm_device *dev, error->ring[i].valid = true; - i915_record_ring_state(dev, ring, &error->ring[i]); + i915_record_ring_state(dev, error, ring, &error->ring[i]); error->ring[i].batchbuffer = i915_error_first_batchbuffer(dev_priv, ring); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index 5d56c95..01aad54 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { * do the writes, and that must have qw aligned offsets, simply pretend it's 8b. */ #define i915_semaphore_seqno_size sizeof(uint64_t) -#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(to) \ +#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(__ring, to) \ (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ - (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ + ((__ring)->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (to))) #define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(__ring, from) \ @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ break; \ } \ - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(RCS); \ - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS); \ - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(BCS); \ - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VECS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, RCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, VCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, BCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, VECS); \ ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[ring->id] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; \ } while(0) -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-24 13:08 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-04-29 21:43 ` Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-02-24 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:23PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Since the semaphore information is in an object, just dump it, and let > the user parse it later. > > NOTE: The page being used for the semaphores are incoherent with the > CPU. No matter what I do, I cannot figure out a way to read anything but > 0s. Note that the semaphore waits are indeed working. > > v2: Don't print signal, and wait (they should be the same). Instead, > print sync_seqno (Chris) > > v3: Free the semaphore error object (Chris) > > v4: Fix semaphore offset calculation during error state collection > (Ville) > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 12 ++++---- > 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > index 028ce5a..9b86874 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state { > u64 fence[I915_MAX_NUM_FENCES]; > struct intel_overlay_error_state *overlay; > struct intel_display_error_state *display; > + struct drm_i915_error_object *semaphore_obj; > > struct drm_i915_error_ring { > bool valid; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > index 2b64493..25fc2ea 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > struct drm_device *dev = error_priv->dev; > drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > struct drm_i915_error_state *error = error_priv->error; > + struct drm_i915_error_object *obj; > int i, j, page, offset, elt; > > if (!error) { > @@ -360,8 +361,6 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > error->pinned_bo_count[0]); > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(error->ring); i++) { > - struct drm_i915_error_object *obj; > - > if ((obj = error->ring[i].batchbuffer)) { > err_printf(m, "%s --- gtt_offset = 0x%08x\n", > dev_priv->ring[i].name, > @@ -436,6 +435,19 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > } > } > > + obj = error->semaphore_obj; > + if (obj) { Still won't pass under Chris's consitency radar. > + err_printf(m, "Semaphore page = 0x%08x\n", obj->gtt_offset); > + for (elt = 0; elt < PAGE_SIZE/16; elt += 4) { > + err_printf(m, "[%04x] %08x %08x %08x %08x\n", > + elt * 4, > + obj->pages[0][elt], > + obj->pages[0][elt+1], > + obj->pages[0][elt+2], > + obj->pages[0][elt+3]); > + } > + } > + > if (error->overlay) > intel_overlay_print_error_state(m, error->overlay); > > @@ -506,6 +518,7 @@ static void i915_error_state_free(struct kref *error_ref) > kfree(error->ring[i].requests); > } > > + i915_error_object_free(error->semaphore_obj); > kfree(error->active_bo); > kfree(error->overlay); > kfree(error->display); > @@ -797,6 +810,33 @@ i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > return NULL; > } > > +static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + struct drm_i915_error_state *error, > + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > + struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > +{ > + struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; > + int i; > + > + if (!i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev_priv->dev)) > + return; > + > + if (!error->semaphore_obj) > + error->semaphore_obj = > + i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj, > + &dev_priv->gtt.base); > + > + for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { > + u16 signal_offset = > + (GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, i) / 4) & PAGE_MASK; (... & PAGE_MASK) / 4; > + u32 *tmp = error->semaphore_obj->pages[0]; > + > + ering->semaphore_mboxes[i] = tmp[signal_offset]; > + ering->semaphore_seqno[i] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[i]; > + } > +} > + > static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > @@ -814,6 +854,7 @@ static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > } > > static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, > + struct drm_i915_error_state *error, > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > { > @@ -822,7 +863,10 @@ static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { > ering->rc_psmi = I915_READ(ring->mmio_base + 0x50); > ering->fault_reg = I915_READ(RING_FAULT_REG(ring)); > - gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) > + gen8_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, error, ring, ering); > + else > + gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); > } > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) { > @@ -948,7 +992,7 @@ static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct drm_device *dev, > > error->ring[i].valid = true; > > - i915_record_ring_state(dev, ring, &error->ring[i]); > + i915_record_ring_state(dev, error, ring, &error->ring[i]); > > error->ring[i].batchbuffer = > i915_error_first_batchbuffer(dev_priv, ring); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > index 5d56c95..01aad54 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { > * do the writes, and that must have qw aligned offsets, simply pretend it's 8b. > */ > #define i915_semaphore_seqno_size sizeof(uint64_t) > -#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(to) \ > +#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(__ring, to) \ > (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ > - (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ > + ((__ring)->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ > (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (to))) > > #define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(__ring, from) \ > @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { > if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ > break; \ > } \ > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(RCS); \ > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS); \ > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(BCS); \ > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VECS); \ > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, RCS); \ > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, VCS); \ > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, BCS); \ > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, VECS); \ > ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[ring->id] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; \ > } while(0) > > -- > 1.9.0 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state 2014-02-24 13:08 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-04-29 21:43 ` Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-04-29 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:08:04PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:23PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Since the semaphore information is in an object, just dump it, and let > > the user parse it later. > > > > NOTE: The page being used for the semaphores are incoherent with the > > CPU. No matter what I do, I cannot figure out a way to read anything but > > 0s. Note that the semaphore waits are indeed working. > > > > v2: Don't print signal, and wait (they should be the same). Instead, > > print sync_seqno (Chris) > > > > v3: Free the semaphore error object (Chris) > > > > v4: Fix semaphore offset calculation during error state collection > > (Ville) > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 12 ++++---- > > 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > index 028ce5a..9b86874 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state { > > u64 fence[I915_MAX_NUM_FENCES]; > > struct intel_overlay_error_state *overlay; > > struct intel_display_error_state *display; > > + struct drm_i915_error_object *semaphore_obj; > > > > struct drm_i915_error_ring { > > bool valid; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > > index 2b64493..25fc2ea 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > > @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > > struct drm_device *dev = error_priv->dev; > > drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > struct drm_i915_error_state *error = error_priv->error; > > + struct drm_i915_error_object *obj; > > int i, j, page, offset, elt; > > > > if (!error) { > > @@ -360,8 +361,6 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > > error->pinned_bo_count[0]); > > > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(error->ring); i++) { > > - struct drm_i915_error_object *obj; > > - > > if ((obj = error->ring[i].batchbuffer)) { > > err_printf(m, "%s --- gtt_offset = 0x%08x\n", > > dev_priv->ring[i].name, > > @@ -436,6 +435,19 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > > } > > } > > > > + obj = error->semaphore_obj; > > + if (obj) { > > Still won't pass under Chris's consitency radar. > > > + err_printf(m, "Semaphore page = 0x%08x\n", obj->gtt_offset); > > + for (elt = 0; elt < PAGE_SIZE/16; elt += 4) { > > + err_printf(m, "[%04x] %08x %08x %08x %08x\n", > > + elt * 4, > > + obj->pages[0][elt], > > + obj->pages[0][elt+1], > > + obj->pages[0][elt+2], > > + obj->pages[0][elt+3]); > > + } > > + } > > + > > if (error->overlay) > > intel_overlay_print_error_state(m, error->overlay); > > > > @@ -506,6 +518,7 @@ static void i915_error_state_free(struct kref *error_ref) > > kfree(error->ring[i].requests); > > } > > > > + i915_error_object_free(error->semaphore_obj); > > kfree(error->active_bo); > > kfree(error->overlay); > > kfree(error->display); > > @@ -797,6 +810,33 @@ i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > return NULL; > > } > > > > +static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > + struct drm_i915_error_state *error, > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > > + struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > > +{ > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *useless; > > + int i; > > + > > + if (!i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev_priv->dev)) > > + return; > > + > > + if (!error->semaphore_obj) > > + error->semaphore_obj = > > + i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, > > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj, > > + &dev_priv->gtt.base); > > + > > + for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { > > + u16 signal_offset = > > + (GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, i) / 4) & PAGE_MASK; > > (... & PAGE_MASK) / 4; > Nice catch. > > + u32 *tmp = error->semaphore_obj->pages[0]; > > + > > + ering->semaphore_mboxes[i] = tmp[signal_offset]; > > + ering->semaphore_seqno[i] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[i]; > > + } > > +} > > + > > static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > > struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > > @@ -814,6 +854,7 @@ static void gen6_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > } > > > > static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, > > + struct drm_i915_error_state *error, > > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > > struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > > { > > @@ -822,7 +863,10 @@ static void i915_record_ring_state(struct drm_device *dev, > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { > > ering->rc_psmi = I915_READ(ring->mmio_base + 0x50); > > ering->fault_reg = I915_READ(RING_FAULT_REG(ring)); > > - gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); > > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) > > + gen8_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, error, ring, ering); > > + else > > + gen6_record_semaphore_state(dev_priv, ring, ering); > > } > > > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) { > > @@ -948,7 +992,7 @@ static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct drm_device *dev, > > > > error->ring[i].valid = true; > > > > - i915_record_ring_state(dev, ring, &error->ring[i]); > > + i915_record_ring_state(dev, error, ring, &error->ring[i]); > > > > error->ring[i].batchbuffer = > > i915_error_first_batchbuffer(dev_priv, ring); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > index 5d56c95..01aad54 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { > > * do the writes, and that must have qw aligned offsets, simply pretend it's 8b. > > */ > > #define i915_semaphore_seqno_size sizeof(uint64_t) > > -#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(to) \ > > +#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(__ring, to) \ > > (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ > > - (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ > > + ((__ring)->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ > > (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (to))) > > > > #define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(__ring, from) \ > > @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { > > if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ > > break; \ > > } \ > > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(RCS); \ > > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS); \ > > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(BCS); \ > > - ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VECS); \ > > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, RCS); \ > > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, VCS); \ > > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, BCS); \ > > + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, VECS); \ > > ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[ring->id] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; \ > > } while(0) > > > > -- > > 1.9.0 > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky ` (2 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Everything should be lined up now to make gen8 semaphores work like they did on previous generations, so just do it. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 2d05d7c..ebeefdd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c @@ -401,12 +401,6 @@ bool i915_semaphore_is_enabled(struct drm_device *dev) if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6) return false; - /* Until we get further testing... */ - if (IS_GEN8(dev)) { - WARN_ON(!i915.preliminary_hw_support); - return false; - } - if (i915.semaphores >= 0) return i915.semaphores; -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 13/13] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky 2014-03-05 12:29 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ville Syrjälä 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Simple debugfs file to display the current state of semaphores. This is useful if you want to see the state without hanging the GPU. NOTE: This patch is optional to the series. NOTE2: Like the GPU error state collection, the reads are currently incoherent. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index d90a707..6f3ecb6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -2235,6 +2235,75 @@ static int i915_display_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) return 0; } +static int i915_semaphore_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) +{ + struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; + struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring; + int i, j, ret; + + if (!i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + seq_puts(m, "Semaphores are disabled\n"); + return 0; + } + + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { + struct page *page; + uint64_t *seqno; + + page = i915_gem_object_get_page(dev_priv->semaphore_obj, 0); + + seqno = (uint64_t *)kmap_atomic(page); + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) { + uint64_t offset; + + seq_printf(m, "%s\n", ring->name); + + seq_puts(m, " Last signal:"); + for (j = 0; j < I915_NUM_RINGS; j++) { + offset = i * I915_NUM_RINGS + j; + seq_printf(m, "0x%08llx (0x%02llx) ", + seqno[offset], offset * 8); + } + seq_putc(m, '\n'); + + seq_puts(m, " Last wait: "); + for (j = 0; j < I915_NUM_RINGS; j++) { + offset = i + (j * I915_NUM_RINGS); + seq_printf(m, "0x%08llx (0x%02llx) ", + seqno[offset], offset * 8); + } + seq_putc(m, '\n'); + + } + kunmap_atomic(seqno); + } else { + seq_puts(m, " Last signal:"); + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) + for (j = 0; j < I915_NUM_RINGS; j++) + seq_printf(m, "0x%08x\n", + I915_READ(ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[j])); + seq_putc(m, '\n'); + } + + seq_puts(m, "\nSync seqno:\n"); + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) { + for (j = 0; j < I915_NUM_RINGS; j++) { + seq_printf(m, " 0x%08x ", ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[j]); + } + seq_putc(m, '\n'); + } + seq_putc(m, '\n'); + + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); + return 0; +} + struct pipe_crc_info { const char *name; struct drm_device *dev; @@ -3681,6 +3750,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = { {"i915_pc8_status", i915_pc8_status, 0}, {"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0}, {"i915_display_info", i915_display_info, 0}, + {"i915_semaphore_status", i915_semaphore_status, 0}, }; #define I915_DEBUGFS_ENTRIES ARRAY_SIZE(i915_debugfs_list) -- 1.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/13] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-03-05 12:29 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ville Syrjälä 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky This appears to not actually be needed on the current code. Just putting it on the ML so we can point bug reports at it later. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c index f8c21a6..782f633 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c @@ -655,6 +655,13 @@ static int do_switch(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, if (!to->is_initialized || i915_gem_context_is_default(to)) hw_flags |= MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT; + /* When SW intends to use semaphore signaling between Command streamers, + * it must avoid lite restores in HW by programming "Force Restore" bit + * to ‘1’ in context descriptor during context submission + */ + if (IS_GEN8(ring->dev) && i915_semaphore_is_enabled(ring->dev)) + hw_flags |= MI_FORCE_RESTORE; + ret = mi_set_context(ring, to, hw_flags); if (ret) goto unpin_out; -- 1.9.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 13/13] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky @ 2014-03-05 12:29 ` Ville Syrjälä 12 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-03-05 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky Looks like I neglected to give any kind of final conclusion on this series. It looks like it should do the right thing, apart from the PAGE_MASK vs. /4 bug. The other things I commented on were just minor nits. And if we drop the poll and force restore patches, I'm happy with the result ;) -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores @ 2014-04-29 21:52 Ben Widawsky 2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-04-29 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX Okay, trying this again after the somewhat painful VCS2 rebase. I think I got to all of Ville's comments, but I could have missed a few. I apologize if so. Daniel, even if you don't merge the whole series, the first few would really help rebase pain - though now that VCS2 is merged, there's probably not much other than execlists to be painful The series is completely untested since the last rebase. I also didn't look really closely to make sure the rebase was correct - I'm just totally short on time atm. It was tested before that. Ben Widawsky (13): drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise drm/i915: gen specific ring init drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait drm/i915: Implement MI decode for gen8 drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state drm/i915: semaphore debugfs DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 70 ++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 10 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 7 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 79 +++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 14 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 405 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 90 ++++++- 9 files changed, 528 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-) -- 1.9.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-04-29 21:52 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores Ben Widawsky @ 2014-04-29 21:52 ` Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-04-29 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define your own space, somewhere in the GTT. The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins with cache locality, but that's all speculative. v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) v3: Move the macros the ringbuffer.h to prevent churn in next patch (Ville) v4: Fixed compilation rebase conflict commit 1ec9e26ddab06459e89a890431b2de064c5d1056 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Fri Feb 14 14:01:11 2014 +0100 drm/i915: Consolidate binding parameters into flags v5: VCS2 rebase Replace hweight_long with hweight32 Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 78 +++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 50dfc3a..44cb744 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1293,6 +1293,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private { struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 0eff337..8e6ec03 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) @@ -255,6 +255,8 @@ #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) @@ -349,6 +351,7 @@ #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index f2bae6f..03324b2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -650,6 +650,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) { struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; + } if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) return; @@ -663,6 +670,85 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) ring->scratch.obj = NULL; } +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) +{ +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; + int i, ret, num_rings; + + num_rings = hweight32(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords += (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) + continue; + + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + } + + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); + + return 0; +} + +static int gen8_xcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) +{ +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 6 + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; + int i, ret, num_rings; + + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) + continue; + + intel_ring_emit(signaller, (MI_FLUSH_DW + 1) | + MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset) | + MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + } + + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); + + return 0; +} + static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, unsigned int num_dwords) { @@ -1904,12 +1990,30 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct intel_ring_buffer *ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS]; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; + int ret; ring->name = "render ring"; ring->id = RCS; ring->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE; if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(dev, 4096); + if (obj == NULL) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate semaphore bo. Disabling semaphores\n"); + i915.semaphores = 0; + } else { + i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, I915_CACHE_LLC); + ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(obj, 0, PIN_NONBLOCK); + if (ret != 0) { + drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base); + DRM_ERROR("Failed to pin semaphore bo. Disabling semaphores\n"); + i915.semaphores = 0; + } else + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = obj; + } + } ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; @@ -1918,16 +2022,10 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + BUG_ON(!dev_priv->semaphore_obj); ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_rcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; @@ -2005,9 +2103,6 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) /* Workaround batchbuffer to combat CS tlb bug. */ if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev)) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; - int ret; - obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(dev, I830_BATCH_LIMIT); if (obj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate batch bo\n"); @@ -2123,25 +2218,8 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - /* - * The current semaphore is only applied on - * pre-gen8 platform. And there is no VCS2 ring - * on the pre-gen8 platform. So the semaphore - * between VCS and VCS2 is initialized as - * INVALID. Gen8 will initialize the sema - * between VCS2 and VCS later. - */ - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS2] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS2] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT; @@ -2260,17 +2338,8 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS2] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS2] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BLT_USER_INTERRUPT; @@ -2327,17 +2396,8 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.wait[VCS2] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.mbox.signal[VCS2] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index 0fdf030..d7de09b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -36,6 +36,32 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page { #define I915_READ_MODE(ring) I915_READ(RING_MI_MODE((ring)->mmio_base)) #define I915_WRITE_MODE(ring, val) I915_WRITE(RING_MI_MODE((ring)->mmio_base), val) +/* seqno size is actually only a uint32, but since we plan to use MI_FLUSH_DW to + * do the writes, and that must have qw aligned offsets, simply pretend it's 8b. + */ +#define i915_semaphore_seqno_size sizeof(uint64_t) +#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(to) \ + (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ + (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ + (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * (to))) + +#define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(from) \ + (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ + ((from) * I915_NUM_RINGS * i915_semaphore_seqno_size) + \ + (i915_semaphore_seqno_size * ring->id)) + +#define GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT do { \ + if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ + break; \ + } \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(RCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(BCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VECS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS2] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS2); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[ring->id] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; \ + } while(0) + enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action { HANGCHECK_IDLE = 0, HANGCHECK_WAIT, @@ -118,15 +144,55 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); + /* GEN8 signal/wait table - never trust comments! + * signal to signal to signal to signal to signal to + * RCS VCS BCS VECS VCS2 + * -------------------------------------------------------------------- + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | VCS2 (0x20) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * VCS | RCS (0x28) | NOP (0x30) | BCS (0x38) | VECS (0x40) | VCS2 (0x48) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * BCS | RCS (0x50) | VCS (0x58) | NOP (0x60) | VECS (0x68) | VCS2 (0x70) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0x78) | VCS (0x80) | BCS (0x88) | NOP (0x90) | VCS2 (0x98) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0xa0) | VCS (0xa8) | BCS (0xb0) | NOP (0xb8) | NOP (0xc0) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * + * Generalization: + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) + * + * sync from sync from sync from sync from sync from + * RCS VCS BCS VECS VCS2 + * -------------------------------------------------------------------- + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | VCS (0x28) | BCS (0x50) | VECS (0x78) | VCS2 (0xa0) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x30) | BCS (0x58) | VECS (0x80) | VCS2 (0xa8) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x38) | NOP (0x60) | VECS (0x88) | VCS2 (0xb0) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x40) | BCS (0x68) | NOP (0x90) | VCS2 (0xb8) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * VCS2 | RCS (0x20) | VCS (0x48) | BCS (0x70) | VECS (0x98) | NOP (0xc0) | + * |------------------------------------------------------------------- + * + * Generalization: + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) + */ struct { u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; - struct { - /* our mbox written by others */ - u32 wait[I915_NUM_RINGS]; - /* mboxes this ring signals to */ - u32 signal[I915_NUM_RINGS]; - } mbox; + union { + struct { + /* our mbox written by others */ + u32 wait[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + /* mboxes this ring signals to */ + u32 signal[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + } mbox; + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + }; /* AKA wait() */ int (*sync_to)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, -- 1.9.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] Broadwell HW semaphores @ 2014-01-29 19:55 Ben Widawsky 2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-01-29 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky These are the remaining patches for enabling HW semaphores on Broadwell. The patches are rebased against the latest drm-intel-nightly, and the only other intentional modifications were those requested by Chris. The functionality they provide is the same as before. Unfortunately, I will not have the ability to test these until I return from FOSDEM - however it sounds like we have some reviewer time now. Since last time: I had a couple of rebase conflicts, and build errors as a result of moving things (like the invention module parameter structure). They were trivial, so the only concern there would be if my 'test-every-commit' script blew up. It also should have all the feedback I had received from Chris on the first round. I wasn't sure what to do with a couple of the things Chris said "drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state" for example. Anything which I was confused about is left in. As before, the series is pushed here: git://people.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel bdw-sema If you find yourself with a problem after running these, you can either disable semaphores from the kernel command line, or revert "drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8" Ben Widawsky (13): drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise drm/i915: gen specific ring init drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 drm/i915: semaphore debugfs drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 69 +++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 6 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 10 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 9 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 76 ++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 330 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 87 ++++++++- 9 files changed, 483 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-) -- 1.8.5.3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-29 19:55 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] Broadwell HW semaphores Ben Widawsky @ 2014-01-29 19:55 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-01-30 12:38 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-01-29 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Intel GFX; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define your own space, somewhere in the GTT. The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins with cache locality, but that's all speculative. v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) { struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; + } if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) return; @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) ring->scratch.obj = NULL; } +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) +{ +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; + int i, ret, num_rings; + + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) + continue; + + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + } + + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); + + return 0; +} + +static int gen8_xcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, + unsigned int num_dwords) +{ +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 6 + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; + int i, ret, num_rings; + + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS + + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) + continue; + + intel_ring_emit(signaller, (MI_FLUSH_DW + 1) | + MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset) | + MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); + } + + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); + + return 0; +} + static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, unsigned int num_dwords) { @@ -1852,16 +1939,67 @@ static int gen6_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, return 0; } +/* seqno size is actually only a uint32, but since we plan to use MI_FLUSH_DW to + * do the writes, and that must have qw aligned offsets, simply pretend it's 8b. + */ +#define SEQNO_SIZE sizeof(uint64_t) +#define GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(to) \ + (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ + (ring->id * I915_NUM_RINGS * SEQNO_SIZE) + \ + (SEQNO_SIZE * (to))) + +#define GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(from) \ + (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->semaphore_obj) + \ + ((from) * I915_NUM_RINGS * SEQNO_SIZE) + \ + (SEQNO_SIZE * ring->id)) + +#define GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT do { \ + if (!dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { \ + break; \ + } \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[RCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(RCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[BCS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(BCS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[VECS] = GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(VECS); \ + ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(RCS); \ + ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(VCS); \ + ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(BCS); \ + ring->semaphore.mbox[VECS] = GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(VECS); \ + ring->semaphore.signal_ggtt[ring->id] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; \ + ring->semaphore.mbox[ring->id] = GEN6_NOSYNC; \ + } while(0) +#undef seqno_size + + + int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) { drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct intel_ring_buffer *ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS]; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; + int ret; ring->name = "render ring"; ring->id = RCS; ring->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE; if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(dev, 4096); + if (obj == NULL) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate semaphore bo. Disabling semaphores\n"); + i915.semaphores = 0; + } else { + i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, I915_CACHE_LLC); + ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(obj, 0, false, true); + if (ret != 0) { + drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base); + DRM_ERROR("Failed to pin semaphore bo. Disabling semaphores\n"); + i915.semaphores = 0; + } else + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = obj; + } + } ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; ring->flush = gen8_render_ring_flush; ring->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq; @@ -1870,17 +2008,11 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno; ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno; ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + BUG_ON(!dev_priv->semaphore_obj); + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_rcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; + } } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) { ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; ring->flush = gen7_render_ring_flush; @@ -1947,9 +2079,6 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) /* Workaround batchbuffer to combat CS tlb bug. */ if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev)) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; - int ret; - obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(dev, I830_BATCH_LIMIT); if (obj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate batch bo\n"); @@ -2064,16 +2193,10 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; + } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; @@ -2135,16 +2258,10 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; + } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_BLT_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; @@ -2190,16 +2307,10 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq; ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer; ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync; - if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) - ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal; - ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.mbox[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; - ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_NOSYNC; + if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) { + ring->semaphore.signal = gen8_xcs_signal; + GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT; + } } else { ring->irq_enable_mask = PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT; ring->irq_get = hsw_vebox_get_irq; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); + /* GEN8 signal/wait table + * signal to signal to signal to signal to + * RCS VCS BCS VECS + * ------------------------------------------------------ + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * + * Generalization: + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) + * + * sync from sync from sync from sync from + * RCS VCS BCS VECS + * ------------------------------------------------------ + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | + * |----------------------------------------------------- + * + * Generalization: + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) + */ struct { u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; /* AKA wait() */ @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { /* our mbox written by others */ u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; /* mboxes this ring signals to */ - u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + union { + u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; + }; /* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */ int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, -- 1.8.5.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky @ 2014-01-30 12:38 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-01-30 12:46 ` Chris Wilson 2014-02-11 22:11 ` Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 2 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-01-30 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define > your own space, somewhere in the GTT. > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins > with cache locality, but that's all speculative. > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- > 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { > > struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; > struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; > uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; > > drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ > #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) > #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) > #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ > #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ > #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) > #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) > +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ > #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) > #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) > #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > { > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + > + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; > + } > > if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > return; > @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > } > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > + unsigned int num_dwords) > +{ > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > + int i, ret, num_rings; > + > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); > + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; Again num_dwords += > +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS > + > + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ > + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); and the +4 goes away. > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { > + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; > + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) > + continue; > + > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | > + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | > + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | > + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > + } > + > + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); > + > + return 0; > +} <snip> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 > void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); > > + /* GEN8 signal/wait table > + * signal to signal to signal to signal to > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * > + * Generalization: > + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) > + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) > + * > + * sync from sync from sync from sync from > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > + * > + * Generalization: > + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) > + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) > + */ > struct { > u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; > /* AKA wait() */ > @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > /* our mbox written by others */ > u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; mbox should also get a u64 friend, right? > /* mboxes this ring signals to */ > - u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > + union { > + u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > + }; > > /* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */ > int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > -- > 1.8.5.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-30 12:38 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-01-30 12:46 ` Chris Wilson 2014-01-30 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter 2014-02-11 22:11 ` Ben Widawsky 1 sibling, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-01-30 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception > > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define > > your own space, somewhere in the GTT. > > > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should > > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms > > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). > > > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided > > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins > > with cache locality, but that's all speculative. > > > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) > > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- > > 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { > > > > struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; > > struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; > > uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; > > > > drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) > > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ > > #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) > > #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) > > #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) > > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) > > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) > > +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we have finished invalidating the TLBs required). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-30 12:46 ` Chris Wilson @ 2014-01-30 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter 2014-01-30 13:25 ` Chris Wilson 2014-01-30 13:35 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-01-30 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, Ville Syrjälä, Ben Widawsky, Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a > separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we > have finished invalidating the TLBs required). We have an igt to exercise tlb invalidation stuff, which runs on all rings. But it only runs a batch, so only uses the CS tlb. Do we need to extend this? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-30 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter @ 2014-01-30 13:25 ` Chris Wilson 2014-01-30 13:35 ` Chris Wilson 1 sibling, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-01-30 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a > > separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we > > have finished invalidating the TLBs required). > > We have an igt to exercise tlb invalidation stuff, which runs on all > rings. But it only runs a batch, so only uses the CS tlb. Do we need > to extend this? You could try and catch out the sampler. Or it may be that the hardware internally serialises the operation of invalidating the TLBs and lookup. Or it may be just such a slim window that it will only be hit during a demo and never a test case ;) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-30 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter 2014-01-30 13:25 ` Chris Wilson @ 2014-01-30 13:35 ` Chris Wilson 2014-02-11 21:48 ` Ben Widawsky 1 sibling, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-01-30 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky, Ben Widawsky On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a > > separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we > > have finished invalidating the TLBs required). > > We have an igt to exercise tlb invalidation stuff, which runs on all > rings. But it only runs a batch, so only uses the CS tlb. Do we need > to extend this? So the spec says: Pipe Control Flush Enable (IVB+) If ENABLED, the PIPE_CONTROL command will wait until all previous writes of immediate data from post sync circles are complete before executing the next command. Post Sync Operation This field specifies an optional action to be taken upon completion of the synchronization operation. TLB Invalidate If ENABLED, all TLBs belonging to Render Engine will be invalidated once the flush operation is complete. Command Streamer Stall Enable If ENABLED, the sync operation will not occur until all previous flush operations pending a completion of those previous flushes will complete, including the flush produced from this command. This enables the command to act similar to the legacy MI_FLUSH command. Going by that, the order is flush, stall, TLB invalidate / post-sync op, [pipe control flush] Based on my reading of the above (which unless someone has a more definitive source) says that without the CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE, the CS can continue operations as soon as the flush is complete - in parallel to the TLB invalidate. Adding CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE would then stall the CS until the post-sync operation completes. That still leaves the possibility that the TLB invalidate is being performed in parallel and is itself provides no CS sync. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-30 13:35 ` Chris Wilson @ 2014-02-11 21:48 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 22:23 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Ben Widawsky, Intel GFX On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:35:41PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > > Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a > > > separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we > > > have finished invalidating the TLBs required). > > > > We have an igt to exercise tlb invalidation stuff, which runs on all > > rings. But it only runs a batch, so only uses the CS tlb. Do we need > > to extend this? > > So the spec says: > > Pipe Control Flush Enable (IVB+) > If ENABLED, the PIPE_CONTROL command will wait until all previous writes > of immediate data from post sync circles are complete before executing > the next command. > > Post Sync Operation > This field specifies an optional action to be taken upon completion of > the synchronization operation. > > TLB Invalidate > If ENABLED, all TLBs belonging to Render Engine will be invalidated once > the flush operation is complete. > > Command Streamer Stall Enable > If ENABLED, the sync operation will not occur until all previous flush > operations pending a completion of those previous flushes will complete, > including the flush produced from this command. This enables the command > to act similar to the legacy MI_FLUSH command. > > Going by that, the order is > > flush, stall, TLB invalidate / post-sync op, [pipe control flush] > > Based on my reading of the above (which unless someone has a more > definitive source) says that without the CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE, the CS > can continue operations as soon as the flush is complete - in parallel > to the TLB invalidate. Adding CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE would then stall the > CS until the post-sync operation completes. That still leaves the > possibility that the TLB invalidate is being performed in parallel and > is itself provides no CS sync. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre so.... what the verdict? -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-11 21:48 ` Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 22:23 ` Chris Wilson 2014-02-11 22:25 ` Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-02-11 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:48:22PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:35:41PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a > > > > separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we > > > > have finished invalidating the TLBs required). > > > > > > We have an igt to exercise tlb invalidation stuff, which runs on all > > > rings. But it only runs a batch, so only uses the CS tlb. Do we need > > > to extend this? > > > > So the spec says: > > > > Pipe Control Flush Enable (IVB+) > > If ENABLED, the PIPE_CONTROL command will wait until all previous writes > > of immediate data from post sync circles are complete before executing > > the next command. > > > > Post Sync Operation > > This field specifies an optional action to be taken upon completion of > > the synchronization operation. > > > > TLB Invalidate > > If ENABLED, all TLBs belonging to Render Engine will be invalidated once > > the flush operation is complete. > > > > Command Streamer Stall Enable > > If ENABLED, the sync operation will not occur until all previous flush > > operations pending a completion of those previous flushes will complete, > > including the flush produced from this command. This enables the command > > to act similar to the legacy MI_FLUSH command. > > > > Going by that, the order is > > > > flush, stall, TLB invalidate / post-sync op, [pipe control flush] > > > > Based on my reading of the above (which unless someone has a more > > definitive source) says that without the CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE, the CS > > can continue operations as soon as the flush is complete - in parallel > > to the TLB invalidate. Adding CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE would then stall the > > CS until the post-sync operation completes. That still leaves the > > possibility that the TLB invalidate is being performed in parallel and > > is itself provides no CS sync. > > -Chris > > > > -- > > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > so.... what the verdict? Gut feeling is that it fixes an issue with IVB TLB invalidate. (Not yet sure if the bug I was looking at was accidentally fixed at the same time as testing this.) So cc stable@ -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-11 22:23 ` Chris Wilson @ 2014-02-11 22:25 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 22:28 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, Ben Widawsky, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Intel GFX On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:23:38PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:48:22PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:35:41PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Oh. So they changed how post-sync writes operated - this should be a > > > > > separate fix for stable I believe (so that batches are not run before we > > > > > have finished invalidating the TLBs required). > > > > > > > > We have an igt to exercise tlb invalidation stuff, which runs on all > > > > rings. But it only runs a batch, so only uses the CS tlb. Do we need > > > > to extend this? > > > > > > So the spec says: > > > > > > Pipe Control Flush Enable (IVB+) > > > If ENABLED, the PIPE_CONTROL command will wait until all previous writes > > > of immediate data from post sync circles are complete before executing > > > the next command. > > > > > > Post Sync Operation > > > This field specifies an optional action to be taken upon completion of > > > the synchronization operation. > > > > > > TLB Invalidate > > > If ENABLED, all TLBs belonging to Render Engine will be invalidated once > > > the flush operation is complete. > > > > > > Command Streamer Stall Enable > > > If ENABLED, the sync operation will not occur until all previous flush > > > operations pending a completion of those previous flushes will complete, > > > including the flush produced from this command. This enables the command > > > to act similar to the legacy MI_FLUSH command. > > > > > > Going by that, the order is > > > > > > flush, stall, TLB invalidate / post-sync op, [pipe control flush] > > > > > > Based on my reading of the above (which unless someone has a more > > > definitive source) says that without the CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE, the CS > > > can continue operations as soon as the flush is complete - in parallel > > > to the TLB invalidate. Adding CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE would then stall the > > > CS until the post-sync operation completes. That still leaves the > > > possibility that the TLB invalidate is being performed in parallel and > > > is itself provides no CS sync. > > > -Chris > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > > > so.... what the verdict? > > Gut feeling is that it fixes an issue with IVB TLB invalidate. > (Not yet sure if the bug I was looking at was accidentally fixed at the > same time as testing this.) > So cc stable@ > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre You still want a separate patch? -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-11 22:25 ` Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 22:28 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-02-11 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Intel GFX On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:25:43PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:23:38PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Gut feeling is that it fixes an issue with IVB TLB invalidate. > > (Not yet sure if the bug I was looking at was accidentally fixed at the > > same time as testing this.) > > So cc stable@ > You still want a separate patch? Actually, bad news for me. The bug I had thought had gone, was merely dorminant. It reappeared, so I have no known issue that this fixes. :( I still think we need to add the Pipe Control Flush Enable to the TLB invalidate sequence though, but no longer urgent. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-01-30 12:38 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-01-30 12:46 ` Chris Wilson @ 2014-02-11 22:11 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 22:22 ` Ben Widawsky 1 sibling, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception > > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define > > your own space, somewhere in the GTT. > > > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should > > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms > > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). > > > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided > > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins > > with cache locality, but that's all speculative. > > > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) > > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- > > 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { > > > > struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; > > struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; > > uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; > > > > drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) > > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ > > #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) > > #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) > > #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) > > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) > > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) > > +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > { > > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > + > > + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { > > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); > > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); > > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; > > + } > > > > if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > > return; > > @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > } > > > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > + unsigned int num_dwords) > > +{ > > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > > + int i, ret, num_rings; > > + > > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); > > + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; > > Again num_dwords += > > > +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS > > + > > + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ > > + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); > > and the +4 goes away. > > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { > > + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; > > + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) > > + continue; > > + > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | > > + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | > > + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | > > + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > + } > > + > > + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > <snip> Got those, thanks. > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 > > void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); > > > > + /* GEN8 signal/wait table > > + * signal to signal to signal to signal to > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * > > + * Generalization: > > + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) > > + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) > > + * > > + * sync from sync from sync from sync from > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > + * > > + * Generalization: > > + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) > > + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) > > + */ > > struct { > > u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; > > /* AKA wait() */ > > @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > /* our mbox written by others */ > > u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > mbox should also get a u64 friend, right? mbox should be gen6 only, given the change to using the gtt on gen8. In this point in the series, semaphores should be forcibly disabled on gen8, so the code looks wrong, but the path cannot [should not] be taken. I suppose I should kill the initialization of mbox for gen8, or somehow consolidate with a union to prevent confusion. > > > /* mboxes this ring signals to */ > > - u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > + union { > > + u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > + }; > > > > /* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */ > > int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > -- > > 1.8.5.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-11 22:11 ` Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 22:22 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 23:01 ` Ben Widawsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:11:04PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception > > > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define > > > your own space, somewhere in the GTT. > > > > > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should > > > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms > > > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). > > > > > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided > > > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins > > > with cache locality, but that's all speculative. > > > > > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) > > > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- > > > 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { > > > > > > struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; > > > struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; > > > uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; > > > > > > drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) > > > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) > > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ > > > #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) > > > #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) > > > #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) > > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) > > > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ > > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) > > > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) > > > +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > { > > > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > + > > > + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { > > > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); > > > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); > > > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; > > > + } > > > > > > if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > > > return; > > > @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > > } > > > > > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > > + unsigned int num_dwords) > > > +{ > > > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > > > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > > > + int i, ret, num_rings; > > > + > > > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); > > > + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; > > > > Again num_dwords += > > > > > +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS > > > + > > > + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ > > > + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); > > > > and the +4 goes away. > > > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { > > > + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; > > > + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) > > > + continue; > > > + > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | > > > + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | > > > + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | > > > + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > > + } > > > + > > > + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > > <snip> > > Got those, thanks. > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > > #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 > > > void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); > > > > > > + /* GEN8 signal/wait table > > > + * signal to signal to signal to signal to > > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * > > > + * Generalization: > > > + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) > > > + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) > > > + * > > > + * sync from sync from sync from sync from > > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > + * > > > + * Generalization: > > > + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) > > > + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) > > > + */ > > > struct { > > > u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; > > > /* AKA wait() */ > > > @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > > /* our mbox written by others */ > > > u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > mbox should also get a u64 friend, right? > > mbox should be gen6 only, given the change to using the gtt on gen8. In > this point in the series, semaphores should be forcibly disabled on > gen8, so the code looks wrong, but the path cannot [should not] be > taken. > > I suppose I should kill the initialization of mbox for gen8, or somehow > consolidate with a union to prevent confusion. > Just to clarify it should be gen6: signal uses signal_mbox for signal wait uses mbox gen8: signal uses signal_ggtt for signal wait uses arithmetic to figure out the offset > > > > > /* mboxes this ring signals to */ > > > - u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > + union { > > > + u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > + }; > > > > > > /* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */ > > > int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > > -- > > > 1.8.5.3 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > > -- > > Ville Syrjälä > > Intel OTC > > -- > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-11 22:22 ` Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 23:01 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-12 9:29 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-11 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:22:37PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:11:04PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception > > > > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define > > > > your own space, somewhere in the GTT. > > > > > > > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should > > > > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms > > > > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). > > > > > > > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided > > > > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins > > > > with cache locality, but that's all speculative. > > > > > > > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) > > > > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- > > > > 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { > > > > > > > > struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; > > > > struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; > > > > uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; > > > > > > > > drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) > > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) > > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) > > > > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ > > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) > > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) > > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) > > > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ > > > > #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) > > > > #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) > > > > #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) > > > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) > > > > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ > > > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) > > > > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) > > > > +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > > index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > > @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > > static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > > { > > > > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > > + > > > > + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { > > > > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); > > > > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); > > > > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; > > > > + } > > > > > > > > if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > > > > return; > > > > @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > > > + unsigned int num_dwords) > > > > +{ > > > > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > > > > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > > > > + int i, ret, num_rings; > > > > + > > > > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); > > > > + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; > > > > > > Again num_dwords += > > > > > > > +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS > > > > + > > > > + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ > > > > + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); > > > > > > and the +4 goes away. > > > > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + > > > > + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { > > > > + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; > > > > + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) > > > > + continue; > > > > + > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | > > > > + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | > > > > + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | > > > > + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > > > <snip> > > > > Got those, thanks. > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > > index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > > @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > > > #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 > > > > void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); > > > > > > > > + /* GEN8 signal/wait table > > > > + * signal to signal to signal to signal to > > > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * > > > > + * Generalization: > > > > + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) > > > > + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) > > > > + * > > > > + * sync from sync from sync from sync from > > > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > + * > > > > + * Generalization: > > > > + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) > > > > + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) > > > > + */ > > > > struct { > > > > u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; > > > > /* AKA wait() */ > > > > @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > > > /* our mbox written by others */ > > > > u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > > > mbox should also get a u64 friend, right? > > > > mbox should be gen6 only, given the change to using the gtt on gen8. In > > this point in the series, semaphores should be forcibly disabled on > > gen8, so the code looks wrong, but the path cannot [should not] be > > taken. > > > > I suppose I should kill the initialization of mbox for gen8, or somehow > > consolidate with a union to prevent confusion. > > > > Just to clarify it should be > > gen6: > signal uses signal_mbox for signal > wait uses mbox > > gen8: > signal uses signal_ggtt for signal > wait uses arithmetic to figure out the offset > Ok, I've fixed this up to make things clearer, but it ends up in the next patch. So look there when I repost. > > > > > > > /* mboxes this ring signals to */ > > > > - u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > + union { > > > > + u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > + }; > > > > > > > > /* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */ > > > > int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > > > -- > > > > 1.8.5.3 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > > > > -- > > > Ville Syrjälä > > > Intel OTC > > > > -- > > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -- > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal 2014-02-11 23:01 ` Ben Widawsky @ 2014-02-12 9:29 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2014-02-12 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: Intel GFX, Ben Widawsky On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:01:31PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:22:37PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:11:04PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > Semaphore signalling works similarly to previous GENs with the exception > > > > > that the per ring mailboxes no longer exist. Instead you must define > > > > > your own space, somewhere in the GTT. > > > > > > > > > > The comments in the code define the layout I've opted for, which should > > > > > be fairly future proof. Ie. I tried to define offsets in abstract terms > > > > > (NUM_RINGS, seqno size, etc). > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: If one wanted to move this to the HWSP they could. I've decided > > > > > one 4k object would be easier to deal with, and provide potential wins > > > > > with cache locality, but that's all speculative. > > > > > > > > > > v2: Update the macro to not need the other ring's ring->id (Chris) > > > > > Update the comment to use the correct formula (Chris) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 38 +++++- > > > > > 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > > index 3673ba1..f521059 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > > @@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private { > > > > > > > > > > struct pci_dev *bridge_dev; > > > > > struct intel_ring_buffer ring[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *semaphore_obj; > > > > > uint32_t last_seqno, next_seqno; > > > > > > > > > > drm_dma_handle_t *status_page_dmah; > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > > > index cbbaf26..8b745dc 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > > > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_B (3 << 19) > > > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_PLANE_C (4 << 19) > > > > > #define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_IVB_SPRITE_C (5 << 19) > > > > > -#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6+ */ > > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */ > > > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22) > > > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21) > > > > > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE (1<<20) > > > > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ > > > > > #define MI_RESTORE_EXT_STATE_EN (1<<2) > > > > > #define MI_FORCE_RESTORE (1<<1) > > > > > #define MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT (1<<0) > > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */ > > > > > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15) > > > > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1) > > > > > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 965+ only */ > > > > > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX MI_INSTR(0x21, 1) > > > > > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ > > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */ > > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9) > > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8) > > > > > +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE (1<<7) /* gen7+ */ > > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4) > > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3) > > > > > #define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2) > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > > > index 37ae2b1..b750835 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > > > > @@ -619,6 +619,13 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > > > static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > > > { > > > > > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { > > > > > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(dev_priv->semaphore_obj); > > > > > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&dev_priv->semaphore_obj->base); > > > > > + dev_priv->semaphore_obj = NULL; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > > > > > return; > > > > > @@ -632,6 +639,86 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) > > > > > ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > +static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > > > > + unsigned int num_dwords) > > > > > +{ > > > > > +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 8 > > > > > + struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev; > > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > > > + struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter; > > > > > + int i, ret, num_rings; > > > > > + > > > > > + num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask); > > > > > + num_dwords = (num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS; > > > > > > > > Again num_dwords += > > > > > > > > > +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS > > > > > + > > > > > + /* XXX: + 4 for the caller */ > > > > > + ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords + 4); > > > > > > > > and the +4 goes away. > > > > > > > > > + if (ret) > > > > > + return ret; > > > > > + > > > > > + for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) { > > > > > + u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i]; > > > > > + if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID) > > > > > + continue; > > > > > + > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | > > > > > + PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE | > > > > > + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset)); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL | > > > > > + MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id)); > > > > > + intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + WARN_ON(i != num_rings); > > > > > + > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > Got those, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > > > index c69ae10..f1e7a66 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > > > > > @@ -111,6 +111,39 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > > > > #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2 > > > > > void (*cleanup)(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring); > > > > > > > > > > + /* GEN8 signal/wait table > > > > > + * signal to signal to signal to signal to > > > > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > > > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x08) | VCS (0x10) | VECS (0x18) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * VCS | RCS (0x20) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x30) | VECS (0x38) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * BCS | RCS (0x40) | VCS (0x48) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x58) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * VECS | RCS (0x60) | VCS (0x68) | BCS (0x70) | NOP (0x78) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Generalization: > > > > > + * f(x, y) := (x->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * y->id) > > > > > + * ie. transpose of g(x, y) > > > > > + * > > > > > + * sync from sync from sync from sync from > > > > > + * RCS VCS BCS VECS > > > > > + * ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > + * RCS | NOP (0x00) | BCS (0x20) | VCS (0x40) | VECS (0x60) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * VCS | RCS (0x08) | NOP (0x28) | BCS (0x48) | VECS (0x68) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * BCS | RCS (0x10) | VCS (0x30) | NOP (0x50) | VECS (0x60) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * VECS | RCS (0x18) | VCS (0x38) | BCS (0x58) | NOP (0x78) | > > > > > + * |----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Generalization: > > > > > + * g(x, y) := (y->id * NUM_RINGS * seqno_size) + (seqno_size * x->id) > > > > > + * ie. transpose of f(x, y) > > > > > + */ > > > > > struct { > > > > > u32 sync_seqno[I915_NUM_RINGS-1]; > > > > > /* AKA wait() */ > > > > > @@ -120,7 +153,10 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer { > > > > > /* our mbox written by others */ > > > > > u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > > > > > mbox should also get a u64 friend, right? > > > > > > mbox should be gen6 only, given the change to using the gtt on gen8. In > > > this point in the series, semaphores should be forcibly disabled on > > > gen8, so the code looks wrong, but the path cannot [should not] be > > > taken. > > > > > > I suppose I should kill the initialization of mbox for gen8, or somehow > > > consolidate with a union to prevent confusion. > > > > > > > Just to clarify it should be > > > > gen6: > > signal uses signal_mbox for signal > > wait uses mbox > > > > gen8: > > signal uses signal_ggtt for signal > > wait uses arithmetic to figure out the offset > > > > Ok, I've fixed this up to make things clearer, but it ends up in the > next patch. So look there when I repost. I was confused by these: + ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = GEN8_WAIT_OFFSET(ring, RCS); So you did store the wait offset into mbox, but then you didn't use the precomputed values and instead recomputed on the spot in gen8 ring_sync(). > > > > > > > > > > /* mboxes this ring signals to */ > > > > > - u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > > + union { > > > > > + u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > > + u64 signal_ggtt[I915_NUM_RINGS]; > > > > > + }; > > > > > > > > > > /* num_dwords is space the caller will need for atomic update */ > > > > > int (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller, > > > > > -- > > > > > 1.8.5.3 > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ville Syrjälä > > > > Intel OTC > > > > > > -- > > > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > > > -- > > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -- > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-29 21:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-02-20 6:19 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:09 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:10 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-03-05 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky 2014-02-24 13:08 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-04-29 21:43 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky 2014-02-20 6:19 ` [PATCH 13/13] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky 2014-03-05 12:29 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ville Syrjälä -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2014-04-29 21:52 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores Ben Widawsky 2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky 2014-01-29 19:55 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] Broadwell HW semaphores Ben Widawsky 2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky 2014-01-30 12:38 ` Ville Syrjälä 2014-01-30 12:46 ` Chris Wilson 2014-01-30 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter 2014-01-30 13:25 ` Chris Wilson 2014-01-30 13:35 ` Chris Wilson 2014-02-11 21:48 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 22:23 ` Chris Wilson 2014-02-11 22:25 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 22:28 ` Chris Wilson 2014-02-11 22:11 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 22:22 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-11 23:01 ` Ben Widawsky 2014-02-12 9:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox