From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: remove an indirection level on PC8 functions Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:11:11 -0800 Message-ID: <20140228091111.7b192ac1@jbarnes-desktop> References: <1393540010-1582-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <1393540010-1582-15-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from qproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [173.254.64.10]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E9A3FA7F0 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:10:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1393540010-1582-15-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Paulo Zanoni Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:26:41 -0300 Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > After the latest changes, the indirection is useless. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 16 ++-------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 3b57257..ef0bcf8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -6673,12 +6673,6 @@ void __hsw_do_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > hsw_disable_lcpll(dev_priv, true, true); > } > > -static void __hsw_enable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > -{ > - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->pc8.lock)); > - intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); > -} > - > void __hsw_do_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev; > @@ -6706,19 +6700,13 @@ void __hsw_do_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > dev_priv->pc8.enabled = false; > } > > -static void __hsw_disable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > -{ > - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->pc8.lock)); > - intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); > -} > - > void hsw_enable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > if (!HAS_PC8(dev_priv->dev)) > return; > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock); > - __hsw_enable_package_c8(dev_priv); > + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock); > } > > @@ -6728,7 +6716,7 @@ void hsw_disable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > return; > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock); > - __hsw_disable_package_c8(dev_priv); > + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock); > } > Oh here it is, the next patch in the series. :) Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center