public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/dp: let drivers specify the name of the I2C-over-AUX adapter
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:32:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310123228.GB26681@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394020227-16738-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1667 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 01:50:27PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
[...]
> I am not entirely happy with adding an extra name field, but I also
> didn't like the caller having to set up aux.ddc.name in advance. Ideas
> welcome.

What you propose is a whole lot better than having to modify the
internals of struct i2c_adapter in advance, and I can't think of
a better alternative either. I have two small comments below.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 35251af3b14e..17832d048147 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -726,7 +726,8 @@ int drm_dp_aux_register_i2c_bus(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>  	aux->ddc.dev.parent = aux->dev;
>  	aux->ddc.dev.of_node = aux->dev->of_node;
>  
> -	strncpy(aux->ddc.name, dev_name(aux->dev), sizeof(aux->ddc.name));
> +	strlcpy(aux->ddc.name, aux->name ? aux->name : dev_name(aux->dev),
> +		sizeof(aux->ddc.name));

I don't see why the change from strncpy() to strlcpy() would be
necessary.

> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
[...]
> @@ -438,6 +438,9 @@ struct drm_dp_aux_msg {
>   * The .dev field should be set to a pointer to the device that implements
>   * the AUX channel.
>   *
> + * The .name field may be used to specify the name of the I2C adapter. If set to
> + * NULL, dev_name() of .dev will be used.
> + *

Nit: That new paragraph sticks out because it's wider than the rest,
even though it still fits into 80 characters.

I don't feel all that strongly about either of the above, so:

Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-10 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-05 11:50 [RFC PATCH] drm/dp: let drivers specify the name of the I2C-over-AUX adapter Jani Nikula
2014-03-10 12:32 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-03-10 13:07   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140310123228.GB26681@ulmo.nvidia.com \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox