From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915: use GEN8_IRQ_INIT on GEN5
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:41:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140318174131.GH30571@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318171138.GA2181@bwidawsk.net>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> >
> > And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
> >
> > We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
> > sent a patch series for this: "[PATCH 00/15] Unify interrupt register
> > init/reset". Now that the BDW code was merged, I have one more
> > argument in favor of these changes.
> >
> > Here's what really changes with the Gen 5 IRQ init code:
> > - We now clear the IIR registers at preinstall (they are also
> > cleared at postinstall, but we will change that later).
> > - We have an additional POSTING_READ at the IMR register.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 852844d..7be7da1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -80,12 +80,30 @@ static const u32 hpd_status_i915[] = { /* i915 and valleyview are the same */
> > [HPD_PORT_D] = PORTD_HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * IIR can theoretically queue up two events. Be paranoid.
> > + * Also, make sure callers of these macros have something equivalent to a
> > + * POSTING_READ on the IIR register.
> > + * */
>
> I don't understand what you mean in this comment. If you're always going
> to sending a posting read after the second IIR write, why not just put
> it in the macro?
Bspec says if there's a 2nd interrupt queued up IMR/IER don't affect that
bit and it will show up /sometimes/ after the first bit has been cleared
from IIR. My best guess for that was "on the next read", hence the
POSTING_READ to make sure it happens.
Or do you mean something else?
In any case a bit of Bspec citation for this would be appropriate.
-Daniel
>
> The reason it wasn't in my original macro is because we've done the
> posting read on IER, and IMR - so we're not going to get new interrupts.
> When the second IIR write lands is irrelevant. The POSTING_READ in
> between is to prevent the [probably impossible] case of the writes
> getting collapsed into one write.
>
> > +#define GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(type, which) do { \
> > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which), 0xffffffff); \
> > + POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which)); \
> > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IER(which), 0); \
> > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which), 0xffffffff); \
> > + POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which)); \
> > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which), 0xffffffff); \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > #define GEN5_IRQ_INIT(type) do { \
> > I915_WRITE(type##IMR, 0xffffffff); \
> > + POSTING_READ(type##IMR); \
> > I915_WRITE(type##IER, 0); \
> > - POSTING_READ(type##IER); \
> > + I915_WRITE(type##IIR, 0xffffffff); \
> > + POSTING_READ(type##IIR); \
> > + I915_WRITE(type##IIR, 0xffffffff); \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > +
> > /* For display hotplug interrupt */
> > static void
> > ironlake_enable_display_irq(drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv, u32 mask)
> > @@ -2789,6 +2807,7 @@ static void gen5_gt_irq_preinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> > GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GT);
> > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6)
> > GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN6_PM);
> > + POSTING_READ(GTIIR);
> > }
> >
> > /* drm_dma.h hooks
> > @@ -2843,25 +2862,6 @@ static void gen8_irq_preinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> > I915_WRITE(GEN8_MASTER_IRQ, 0);
> > POSTING_READ(GEN8_MASTER_IRQ);
> >
> > - /* IIR can theoretically queue up two events. Be paranoid */
> > -#define GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(type, which) do { \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which), 0xffffffff); \
> > - POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which)); \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IER(which), 0); \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which), 0xffffffff); \
> > - POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which)); \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which), 0xffffffff); \
> > - } while (0)
> > -
> > -#define GEN8_IRQ_INIT(type) do { \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IMR, 0xffffffff); \
> > - POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IMR); \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IER, 0); \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IIR, 0xffffffff); \
> > - POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IIR); \
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IIR, 0xffffffff); \
> > - } while (0)
> > -
> > GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 0);
> > GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 1);
> > GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 2);
> > @@ -2871,12 +2871,9 @@ static void gen8_irq_preinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> > GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(DE_PIPE, pipe);
> > }
> >
> > - GEN8_IRQ_INIT(DE_PORT);
> > - GEN8_IRQ_INIT(DE_MISC);
> > - GEN8_IRQ_INIT(PCU);
> > -#undef GEN8_IRQ_INIT
> > -#undef GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX
> > -
> > + GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_DE_PORT_);
> > + GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_DE_MISC_);
> > + GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_PCU_);
> > POSTING_READ(GEN8_PCU_IIR);
> >
> > ibx_irq_preinstall(dev);
> > --
> > 1.8.5.3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 23:10 [PATCH 00/20] ILK+ interrupt improvements, v2 Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915: add GEN5_IRQ_INIT macro Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm/i915: also use GEN5_IRQ_INIT with south display interrupts Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915: use GEN8_IRQ_INIT on GEN5 Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 17:11 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-18 17:41 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-03-26 20:00 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-26 21:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-27 12:06 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 04/20] drm/i915: add GEN5_IRQ_FINI Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915: don't forget to uninstall the PM IRQs Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 17:59 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 06/20] drm/i915: properly clear IIR at irq_uninstall on Gen5+ Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-11 8:25 ` Chris Wilson
2014-03-18 17:20 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 07/20] drm/i915: add GEN5_IRQ_INIT Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 18:16 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915: check if IIR is still zero at postinstall on Gen5+ Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 18:20 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-19 8:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-19 17:50 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-27 13:34 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/i915: fix SERR_INT init/reset code Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 18:24 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/i915: fix GEN7_ERR_INT " Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 19:42 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915: fix open coded gen5_gt_irq_preinstall Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915: extract ibx_irq_uninstall Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915: call ibx_irq_uninstall from gen8_irq_uninstall Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915: enable SDEIER later Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 20:29 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-27 14:39 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-28 6:20 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-28 7:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/i915: remove ibx_irq_uninstall Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/i915: add missing intel_hpd_irq_uninstall Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 20:38 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/i915: add ironlake_irq_reset Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/i915: add gen8_irq_reset Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 20:43 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-27 14:48 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/i915: only enable HWSTAM interrupts on postinstall on ILK+ Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-07 23:10 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/i915: add POSTING_READs to the IRQ init/reset macros Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-18 20:45 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-18 20:53 ` [PATCH 00/20] ILK+ interrupt improvements, v2 Ben Widawsky
2014-03-19 8:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-19 17:25 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-26 20:33 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-26 20:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-03-26 21:35 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140318174131.GH30571@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox