Re: [PATCH 01/26] drm/i915: Split out verbose PPGTT dumping

[Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:08:00PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:57:42AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >  static void gen6_ppgtt_info(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_device *dev, bool verbose)
> > @@ -1838,14 +1841,11 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_info(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_device *dev, bool ver
> >  
> >  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
> >  		struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
> > -		struct i915_hw_ppgtt *pvt_ppgtt;
> >  
> > -		pvt_ppgtt = ctx_to_ppgtt(file_priv->private_default_ctx);
> >  		seq_printf(m, "proc: %s\n",
> >  			   get_pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID)->comm);
> 
> And 
> 	seq_printf(m, "\nproc: %s\n",
> for good measure
> 
> > -		print_ppgtt(m, pvt_ppgtt, "Default context");
> > -		if (verbose)
> > -			idr_for_each(&file_priv->context_idr, per_file_ctx, m);
> > +		idr_for_each(&file_priv->context_idr, per_file_ctx,
> > +			     (void *)((unsigned long)m | verbose));
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > 
> > -- 

Thanks, I like it. I'm assuming you didn't want the count_pt_pages stuck
in at this point (your diff was based on the end result)? I can do that
if you prefer it. It seems pointless to me though.

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center