From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow user modes to exceed DVI 165MHz limit
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:03:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140327110331.GQ21652@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140327093736.GA30820@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:37:36AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:08:45AM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > So relax the checks a bit, and apply the single-link DVI dotclock limit
> > only when filtering the mode list, and ignore the limit when setting
> > a user specified mode.
>
> Mind enlightening me as to how this actually works? I thought all
> display modes were validated before we used them, so how come this
> sneaks through?
>
> So it goes like this:
>
> userspace calls GETCONNECTOR
> kernel: fill_modes -> drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes -> mode_valid?
>
> but
>
> userspace calls SETCRTC with a random mode
> kernel: applies random mode without validation
>
> Seriously we don't do any checking that the mode given to SETCRTC is
> applicable and not in any way harmful before setting registers?
Pretty much. Calling our user mode validation even "minimal" is a bit
of a stretch. And the checks we have in the .mode_valid() hooks are
lacking as well.
As far as this particular patch goes, we do check the port clock in the
hdmi compute_config hook, so I had to relax it a bit to ignore the single
link DVI limit there, and instead just check it against the hardware
specific limit from BSpec. I think that's a reasonable thing to do. If
we wanted to protect the user (or the equipment in case of CRTs) more,
we should probably check things against the EDID min/max scan rates and
max clock.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 9:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow user modes to exceed DVI 165MHz limit ville.syrjala
2014-03-27 9:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2014-03-27 11:03 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-03-27 13:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-11 14:28 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140327110331.GQ21652@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox