From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Deprecate UMS harder
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:19:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140331171927.GU22327@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140331154447.GC7314@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:44:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:23:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Progess according to the deprecation plan laid out in
> >
> > commit b30324adaf8d2e5950a602bde63030d15a61826f
> > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Date: Wed Nov 13 22:11:25 2013 +0100
> >
> > drm/i915: Deprecated UMS support
> >
> > and disable UMS for 3.16.
>
> Please reiterate that it has been 5 years since the last userspace to
> support UMS was released.
Done
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> I agree that we should mark UMS as BROKEN, it no longer receives testing
> and untested code is broken. I feel a it saddened as for those people
> who still insist that UMS is better (usually because the BIOS breaks
> something) should be left untouched.
>
> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
and merged the patch. I guess we'll figure out soon whether we need to
back off on this since 3.14 (which is the first release with the
deprecated UMS) is now out the door ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 14:23 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Deprecate UMS harder Daniel Vetter
2014-03-31 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: dmesg output for VT-d testing Daniel Vetter
2014-03-31 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add debug module option for VTd validation Daniel Vetter
2014-04-01 6:52 ` Jani Nikula
2014-04-01 7:33 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-04-01 7:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-01 8:14 ` Jani Nikula
2014-04-03 9:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Deprecate UMS harder Chris Wilson
2014-03-31 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140331171927.GU22327@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox