From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] BDW runtime PM fixes
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:58:13 +0200
Message-ID: <20140402145813.GV7225@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1396391989-2244-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com
 [74.125.82.181])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D666EB87
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2014 07:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q58so355281wes.26
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 07:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1396391989-2244-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:39:46PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> Hi
> 
> I got a little surprised to see the BDW patches merged so fast, I thought I was
> going to have time to resend the last series with these last patches in.
> 
> The first patch replaces a HSW-specific WARN that was happening all the time on
> BDW with a gen-agnostic WARN. The second patch is just a debugfs fix. The third
> patch fixes an infinite loop, but it does not fix the undelying reason why the
> infinite loop happens, so maybe we don't want to merge it so we don't hide the
> real bug.
> 
> With these last patches on top of -nightly, my BDW machine passes pm_pc8 without
> errors.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paulo
> 
> Paulo Zanoni (2):
>   drm/i915: only check for irqs_disabled when disabling LCPLL
>   drm/i915: fix infinite loop at gen6_update_ring_freq

Apparently management isn't fully appeased yet, so I've pulled these two
in, too.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch