From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Make contexts non-snooped on
 non-LLC platforms
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:00:15 +0200
Message-ID: <20140404160015.GU7225@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1396278589-27882-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 <1396618570-11475-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 <20140404134100.GC21064@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com (mail-we0-f180.google.com
 [74.125.82.180])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36466E04D
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Fri,  4 Apr 2014 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p61so3592328wes.25
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140404134100.GC21064@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:36:10PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com w=
rote:
> > From: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > =

> > We don't do CPU access to GPU contexts so making the GPU access snoop
> > the CPU caches seems silly, and potentially expensive.
> > =

> > v2: Use !IS_VALLEYVIEW instead of HAS_LLC as this is really
> >     about what the PTEs can represent.
> >     Add a comment clarifying the situation.
> > =

> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- =

Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch