From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] Execlists Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 19:12:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20140407181243.GH6407@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1395943218-7708-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECD96E62C for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1395943218-7708-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: oscar.mateo@intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 05:59:29PM +0000, oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote: > From: Oscar Mateo > > Hi all, > > This patch series implement execlists for GEN8+. Before continuing, it > is important to mention that I might have taken upon myself to > assemble the series and rewrite it for upstreaming, but many people > have worked on this series before me. Two more things before I forget: - The error reporting seems broken and doesn't report the ring buffers content nor the correct per-ring register, from a cursory glance (fairly important, we can't go live without good error state support) - We could allocate the ring buffer in the same allocation as the context, that'd save one allocation (small detail) -- Damien