public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: aaron.lu@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kent.baxley@canonical.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	EGriffith92@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: do not setup backlight if not available according to VBT
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:45:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409134526.GW9262@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397039735-2561-2-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:35:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Some machines use an external EC for controlling the backlight. Info
> about this is present in the VBT. Do not setup native backlight control
> if no PWM backlight is available or supported according to VBT. The
> acpi_backlight interface appears to work for the EC control.
> 
> In most cases there has been no harm done, but it looks like there are
> machines out there that have both an EC and our PWM line connected to
> the same wire. This, obviously, does not end well.
> 
> This should fix the regression caused by
> commit bc0bb9fd1c7810407ab810d204bbaecb255fddde
> Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Nov 14 12:14:29 2013 +0200
> 
>     drm/i915: remove QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE
> 
> AFAICT the quirk removed by the above commit effectively resulted in
> i915 not driving the backlight PWM output, thus not messing things up.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76276
> Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47941
> CC: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
> CC: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
> CC: Eric Griffith <EGriffith92@gmail.com>
> CC: Kent Baxley <kent.baxley@canonical.com>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org [v3.14+]

Imo this part is a bit frisky - if we get positive testing on the xps13
machines I'd shovel this into 3.15-fixes and then resurrect the old hack
for stable kernels. Imo this is risky enough that we should attempt to
backport it before 3.15 is actually released.
-Daniel

> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> index cb058408c70e..0eead16aeda7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> @@ -1065,6 +1065,11 @@ int intel_panel_setup_backlight(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!dev_priv->vbt.backlight.present) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("native backlight control not available per VBT\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* set level and max in panel struct */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->backlight_lock, flags);
>  	ret = dev_priv->display.setup_backlight(intel_connector);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-09 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-09 10:35 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: check VBT for supported backlight type Jani Nikula
2014-04-09 10:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: do not setup backlight if not available according to VBT Jani Nikula
2014-04-09 13:45   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-04-10  8:09     ` Jani Nikula
2014-04-09 17:01   ` Kamal Mostafa
2014-04-09 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: check VBT for supported backlight type Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140409134526.GW9262@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=EGriffith92@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=kent.baxley@canonical.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox