public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: get power domain in case the BIOS enabled eDP VDD
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:21:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140410072150.GK9262@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397080053-22171-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:47:33PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> If I unplug the eDP monitor, the BIOS of my machine will enable the
> VDD bit, then when the driver loads it will think VDD is enabled. It
> will detect that the eDP is not enabled and return false from
> intel_edp_init_connector. This will trigger a call to
> edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(), which trigger a WARN saying that the
> refcount of the power domain is less than zero.
> 
> The problem happens because the driver gets a refcount whenever it
> enables the VDD bit, and puts the refcount whenever it disables the
> VDD bit. But on this case, the BIOS enabled VDD, so all we do is to
> call put() without calling get() first, so the code added is there to
> make sure we always have the get() in case the BIOS enabled the bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Is this the bug reported by Chris on irc yesterday? Chris?
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index e48d47c..a432904 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3638,7 +3638,8 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  {
>  	struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
>  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> -	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = intel_encoder->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = NULL;
>  	bool has_dpcd;
> @@ -3648,6 +3649,14 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	if (!is_edp(intel_dp))
>  		return true;
>  
> +	/* The VDD bit needs a power domain reference, so if the bit is already
> +	 * enabled when we boot, grab this reference. */
> +	if (edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp)) {
> +		enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> +		power_domain = intel_display_port_power_domain(intel_encoder);
> +		intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
>  	intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
>  	has_dpcd = intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp);
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-10  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-09 21:47 [PATCH] drm/i915: get power domain in case the BIOS enabled eDP VDD Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-10  7:21 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-04-10  7:36   ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-11 13:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-22 22:55   ` [PATCH 1/4] " Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-22 22:55     ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: add intel_dp_power_get/put Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-23  9:45       ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-24 13:49         ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: add intel_encoder_power_get/put Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-24 14:11           ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-24 15:14             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-22 22:55     ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: remove redundant is_edp() check Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-22 22:55     ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: remove useless runtime PM get call Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-23  9:52       ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-24 13:50         ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: remove useless runtime PM get calls Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-24 14:05           ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-07-14 15:59             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23  6:59     ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: get power domain in case the BIOS enabled eDP VDD Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 11:02     ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140410072150.GK9262@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox