From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix deadlock during driver init on ILK Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:32:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20140425203203.GA26374@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1398453111-9856-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439AE6EF82 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id d49so3143086eek.27 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1398453111-9856-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:11:51PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wro= te: > From: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > = > We have a struct_mutex deadlock during driver init on ILK > = > [ 54.320273] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > [ 54.320371] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > [ 54.320471] 3.15.0-rc2-flip_race+ #2 Not tainted > [ 54.320567] --------------------------------------------- > [ 54.320665] modprobe/2178 is trying to acquire lock: > [ 54.320762] (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [] in= tel_enable_gt_powersave+0xa5/0x9d0 [i915] > [ 54.321111] > [ 54.321111] but task is already holding lock: > [ 54.321250] (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [] in= tel_modeset_init_hw+0x3e/0x60 [i915] > [ 54.321583] > [ 54.321583] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 54.321724] Possible unsafe locking scenario: > [ 54.321724] > [ 54.321863] CPU0 > [ 54.321954] ---- > [ 54.322046] lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > [ 54.322221] lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > [ 54.322397] > [ 54.322397] *** DEADLOCK *** > [ 54.322397] > [ 54.322638] May be due to missing lock nesting notation > [ 54.322638] > [ 54.322781] 4 locks held by modprobe/2178: > [ 54.322875] #0: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [] __dr= iver_attach+0x5b/0xb0 > [ 54.323230] #1: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [] __dr= iver_attach+0x69/0xb0 > [ 54.323582] #2: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: []= drm_dev_register+0x2d/0x120 [drm] > [ 54.323945] #3: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [] intel_modeset_init_hw+0x3e/0x60 [i915] > = > This regression got introduced in: > commit 586d5270b60dc1f35cc3ca982d403765bad77965 > Author: Imre Deak > Date: Mon Apr 14 20:24:28 2014 +0300 > = > drm/i915: move getting struct_mutex lower in the callstack during GPU= reset > = > Fix the problem by not taking struct_mutex around intel_enable_gt_powersa= ve() > in intel_modeset_init_hw() since intel_enable_gt_powersave() now grabs the > mutex itself. > = > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- = Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch