From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:35:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140430113537.GJ18465@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398808360-3674-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:52:27PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Okay, trying this again after the somewhat painful VCS2 rebase. I think I got
> to all of Ville's comments, but I could have missed a few. I apologize if so.
>
> Daniel, even if you don't merge the whole series, the first few would really
> help rebase pain - though now that VCS2 is merged, there's probably not much
> other than execlists to be painful
>
> The series is completely untested since the last rebase. I also didn't look
> really closely to make sure the rebase was correct - I'm just totally short on
> time atm. It was tested before that.
I think it looks all right, but I must admit to my eyes glazing over
when looking at the ring->semaphore... init parts.
I don't really like the GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT macro. Not sure why
it's not a simple static function.
But anyway I think you can slap on
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
for patches 1-7 and 10-11 if they didn't have it already.
I left out the poll patch since it shouldn't be needed for production hw
AFAICS (I guess we can merge it if we add a comment there that we should
try to remove it once the early hardware is sufficiently phased out). The
force restore patch doesn't seem applicable for ring buffer mode, and I
didn't really look at the debugfs patch so far.
The missing bits seem to be one or two workarounds and the
semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring() thing for which I tried to
cobble together something in my reply.
>
> Ben Widawsky (13):
> drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct
> drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func
> drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal()
> drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise
> drm/i915: gen specific ring init
> drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal
> drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait
> drm/i915: Implement MI decode for gen8
> drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores
> drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection
> drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state
> drm/i915: semaphore debugfs
> DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 70 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 7 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 79 +++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 14 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 405 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 90 ++++++-
> 9 files changed, 528 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-30 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-29 21:52 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Implement MI decode for gen8 Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 11:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-07 16:59 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 10:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky
2014-05-03 2:23 ` [PATCH 12.1/13] drm/i915: Small semaphore debugfs fixup Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 13/13] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 7:13 ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-30 18:44 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 19:03 ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-30 19:27 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 11:35 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140430113537.GJ18465@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox