From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:17:15 +0200
Message-ID: <20140506201715.GG5730@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <20140428132613.GA2368@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <5368DED4.5050401@t-online.de> <87k39zqbju.fsf@intel.com>
 <20140506185210.GA5730@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <53694041.6010409@t-online.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53694041.6010409@t-online.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
> On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
> >>>On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression introduced after 3.14
> >>>>Egbert Eich (1):
> >>>>        drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct order
> >>Daniel, want me to pick that for -fixes?
> >Yeah I geuss so. People never complained that the link isn't there, us
> >adding it for one kernel release to the wrong place doesn't really sound
> >too bothersome.
> >
> >But if this unbreaks a system somewhere then it makes sense to apply to
> >-fixes.
> >
> >Knut, how exactly does your system blow up?
> Well, it's only the warning generated at boot time that would irritate users.
> As a patch is known and tested it's probably a good idea to fix it before
> people complain to lkml and bugzilla.

Ah, I didn't realize there's a warning, I've thought only the symlink goes
the wrong way. In that case it's good to go for -fixes.

Thanks for pointing this out.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch