From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@linux.intel.com>,
Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Implement MI decode for gen8
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 09:59:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507165914.GE5147@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140430112114.GI18465@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:21:15PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:52:35PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > This is needed to implement ipehr_is_semaphore_wait
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 11 +++++------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 2d76183..bfd21c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -2561,12 +2561,9 @@ static bool
> > ipehr_is_semaphore_wait(struct drm_device *dev, u32 ipehr)
> > {
> > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) {
> > - /*
> > - * FIXME: gen8 semaphore support - currently we don't emit
> > - * semaphores on bdw anyway, but this needs to be addressed when
> > - * we merge that code.
> > - */
> > - return false;
> > + /* Broadwell's semaphore wait is 3 dwords. We hope IPEHR is the
> > + * first dword. */
> > + return (ipehr >> 23) == 0x1c;
> > } else {
> > ipehr &= ~MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_MASK;
> > return ipehr == (MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX | MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE |
> > @@ -2586,6 +2583,8 @@ semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 ipehr)
> > * FIXME: gen8 semaphore support - currently we don't emit
> > * semaphores on bdw anyway, but this needs to be addressed when
> > * we merge that code.
> > + *
> > + * XXX: Gen8 needs more than just IPEHR.
> > */
>
> I believe something like this should take care of the remaining gap.
>
Thanks for the help. At this point I just want to get the damn thing
merged, and want to avoid any extra risk. Would you mind resending this
as a distinct patch (authored by you), after we get the rest merged?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 2446e61..cd1069e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2590,19 +2590,21 @@ ipehr_is_semaphore_wait(struct drm_device *dev, u32 ipehr)
> }
>
> static struct intel_ring_buffer *
> -semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 ipehr)
> +semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> + u32 ipehr, u64 offset)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller;
> int i;
>
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv->dev)->gen >= 8) {
> - /*
> - * FIXME: gen8 semaphore support - currently we don't emit
> - * semaphores on bdw anyway, but this needs to be addressed when
> - * we merge that code.
> - */
> - return NULL;
> + for_each_ring(signaller, dev_priv, i) {
> + if (ring == signaller)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (offset == signaller->semaphore.signal_gtt[ring->id])
> + return signaller;
> + }
> } else {
> u32 sync_bits = ipehr & MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_MASK;
>
> @@ -2627,6 +2629,7 @@ semaphore_waits_for(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 *seqno)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
> u32 cmd, ipehr, head;
> + u64 offset = 0;
> int i;
>
> ipehr = I915_READ(RING_IPEHR(ring->mmio_base));
> @@ -2662,7 +2665,12 @@ semaphore_waits_for(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 *seqno)
> return NULL;
>
> *seqno = ioread32(ring->virtual_start + head + 4) + 1;
> - return semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring(ring, ipehr);
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv->dev)->gen >= 8) {
> + offset = ioread32(ring->virtual_start + head + 12);
> + offset <<= 32;
> + offset |= ioread32(ring->virtual_start + head + 8);
> + }
> + return semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring(ring, ipehr, offset);
> }
>
> static int semaphore_passed(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
>
> > return NULL;
> > } else {
> > --
> > 1.9.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-29 21:52 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Implement MI decode for gen8 Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 11:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-07 16:59 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2014-05-07 17:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 10:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky
2014-05-03 2:23 ` [PATCH 12.1/13] drm/i915: Small semaphore debugfs fixup Ben Widawsky
2014-04-29 21:52 ` [PATCH 13/13] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 7:13 ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-30 18:44 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 19:03 ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-30 19:27 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-04-30 11:35 ` [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] BDW Semaphores Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140507165914.GE5147@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.widawsky@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox